• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating resident candidates: does closed file review impact faculty ratings?

作者信息

Hauge Linnea S, Stroessner Steven J, Chowdhry Shahnaz, Wool Norman L

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):761-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.020
PMID:17512292
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine faculty ratings of resident candidates in closed and open file conditions.

METHODS

Surgical faculty conducted interviews of 70 resident candidates. Interviewers completed an evaluation following a closed file interview then reviewed the candidate's Electronic Residency Application Service file and completed the evaluation again.

RESULTS

A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) yielded significant file x familiarity (P < .01), familiarity x attribute (P < .01), and file x familiarity x attribute (P < .05) interactions. Analyses for each attribute revealed consistent findings in ratings of candidates' intelligence, maturity, interpersonal skills, motivation for learning, ability to work with others, qualifications to succeed in surgery, and likelihood to succeed in surgery. Known candidates were rated higher until files were examined. After file review, unknown candidates were seen to be as strong as or stronger than known candidates.

CONCLUSION

Interviewers rate known and unknown candidates differently in open and closed file conditions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating resident candidates: does closed file review impact faculty ratings?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):761-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.020.
2
Development of an objective rating system for residency applications.
Surgery. 1984 Aug;96(2):302-7.
3
Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.住院医师申请过程中教员面试的重要性。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;64(6):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.05.003.
4
Family practice resident selection using a videotaped interview.使用视频面试进行家庭医学住院医师选拔。
Fam Med. 1986 Jan-Feb;18(1):40-1.
5
Contributions of surgical residents to patient satisfaction: impact of residents beyond clinical care.外科住院医师对患者满意度的贡献:住院医师超出临床护理的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2008 May-Jun;65(3):243-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.01.005.
6
The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents.个人面试:评估性格相似性对骨科住院医师选拔产生偏差的可能性。
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10):1364-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6a9af.
7
Relationship of physical appearance and professional demeanor to interview evaluations and rankings of medical residency applicants.医学住院医师申请者的外貌与职业风度与面试评估及排名的关系。
J Psychol. 1983 Jan;113(1st Half):61-5. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1983.9923557.
8
Introduction of bias in residency-candidate interviews.住院医师候选人面试中的偏差引入
Surgery. 1991 Aug;110(2):253-8.
9
Residency selection: should interviewers be given applicants' board scores?住院医师选拔:应向面试官提供申请人的委员会考试成绩吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;184(3):508-13. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.109868.
10
The role of blinded interviews in the assessment of surgical residency candidates.盲法面试在外科住院医师候选人评估中的作用。
Am J Surg. 2001 Aug;182(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00668-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Medical Education Applicants: A Systematic Review.基于证据的研究生医学教育申请人面试实践:系统评价。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Apr;16(2):151-165. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00115.1. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores.探索眼科住院医师面试分数中与日程安排相关的潜在偏见及性别偏见。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2022 Aug 3;14(2):e153-e165. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744272. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
AAIM Recommendations to Promote Equity and Inclusion in the Internal Medicine Residency Interview Process.
促进内科住院医师面试过程公平与包容的 AAIM 建议。
Am J Med. 2022 Dec;135(12):1509-1516.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
4
Trust Me, I Know Them: Assessing Interpersonal Bias in Surgery Residency Interviews.相信我,我了解他们:评估外科住院医师面试中的人际偏见。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Jun;14(3):289-294. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00882.1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
Bias in recruitment: A focus on virtual interviews and holistic review to advance diversity.招聘中的偏见:聚焦虚拟面试和全面评估以促进多元化。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S135-S139. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10661. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Overemphasis of USMLE and Its Potential Impact on Diversity in Otolaryngology.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)的过度强调及其对耳鼻喉科多样性的潜在影响。
OTO Open. 2021 Jul 20;5(3):2473974X211031470. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211031470. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
7
Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.面试在住院医师候选人选拔中的应用:文献综述
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):539-48. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00236.1.