Hylek Elaine M, Evans-Molina Carmella, Shea Carol, Henault Lori E, Regan Susan
Research Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 91 East Concord St, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Circulation. 2007 May 29;115(21):2689-96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653048. Epub 2007 May 21.
Warfarin is effective in the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation but is under used in clinical care. Concerns exist that published rates of hemorrhage may not reflect real-world practice. Few patients > or = 80 years of age were enrolled in trials, and studies of prevalent use largely reflect a warfarin-tolerant subset. We sought to define the tolerability of warfarin among an elderly inception cohort with atrial fibrillation.
Consecutive patients who started warfarin were identified from January 2001 to June 2003 and followed for 1 year. Patients had to be > or = 65 years of age, have established care at the study institution, and have their warfarin managed on-site. Outcomes included major hemorrhage, time to termination of warfarin, and reason for discontinuation. Of 472 patients, 32% were > or = 80 years of age, and 91% had > or = 1 stroke risk factor. The cumulative incidence of major hemorrhage for patients > or = 80 years of age was 13.1 per 100 person-years and 4.7 for those < 80 years of age (P=0.009). The first 90 days of warfarin, age > or = 80 years, and international normalized ratio (INR) > or = 4.0 were associated with increased risk despite trial-level anticoagulation control. Within the first year, 26% of patients > or = 80 years of age stopped taking warfarin. Perceived safety issues accounted for 81% of them. Rates of major hemorrhage and warfarin termination were highest among patients with CHADS2 scores (an acronym for congestive heart failure, hypertension, age > or = 75, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack) of > or = 3.
Rates of hemorrhage derived from younger noninception cohorts underestimate the bleeding that occurs in practice. This finding coupled with the short-term tolerability of warfarin likely contributes to its underutilization. Stroke prevention among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation remains a challenging and pressing health concern.
华法林在预防心房颤动患者中风方面有效,但在临床治疗中应用不足。有人担心已公布的出血发生率可能无法反映实际临床实践情况。很少有年龄≥80岁的患者纳入试验,且关于普遍使用情况的研究很大程度上反映的是对华法林耐受的亚组。我们试图确定老年初发心房颤动队列中使用华法林的耐受性。
从2001年1月至2003年6月确定开始使用华法林的连续患者,并随访1年。患者年龄必须≥65岁,在研究机构接受过既定治疗,且华法林在现场管理。结局包括大出血、华法林停药时间及停药原因。472例患者中,32%年龄≥80岁,91%有≥1个中风危险因素。年龄≥80岁患者大出血的累积发生率为每100人年13.1例,年龄<80岁患者为4.7例(P=0.009)。尽管在试验水平上进行了抗凝控制,但华法林治疗的前90天、年龄≥80岁以及国际标准化比值(INR)≥4.0与风险增加相关。在第1年内,26%年龄≥80岁的患者停止服用华法林。其中81%是出于对安全性的担忧。在CHADS2评分(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄≥75岁、糖尿病以及既往中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的首字母缩写)≥3的患者中,大出血和华法林停药率最高。
来自较年轻非初发队列的出血发生率低估了实际发生的出血情况。这一发现加上华法林的短期耐受性可能导致其使用不足。老年心房颤动患者的中风预防仍然是一个具有挑战性且紧迫的健康问题。