Deuschl Günther, Vaitkus Antanas, Fox Gabriele-Cornelia, Roscher Torsten, Schremmer Dieter, Gordin Ariel
Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany.
Mov Disord. 2007 Aug 15;22(11):1550-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.21473.
In this 12-wk, multi-center, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded study, efficacy and tolerability of Entacapone (ENT) or Cabergoline (CBG) in conjunction with levodopa were compared in 161 older Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off. Patients received either ENT, 3 to 5 times daily, or CBG, titrated according to requirements to a maximum of 6 mg/d. A significant decrease of nearly 2 hours in the daily OFF-time (primary efficacy variable) was recorded in both treatment groups. The non-inferiority test failed despite a trend in favor of ENT. Reduction in OFF-time occurred faster in the ENT compared to the CBG treated patients. A decrease of approximately 20% was detected in parts II and III of the UPDRS, with no differences between the groups. Forty-three percent of the patients in the ENT group reported dyskinesias at baseline, and 35% at the final visit. The corresponding figures in the CBG group were 46% and 43%. Quality of life, measured by PDQ-39, increased substantially with both ENT and CBG. The mean daily dosage at the final visit was 698 mg for ENT (plus 447 mg levodopa) and 3.45 mg for CBG (plus 475 mg levodopa). Adverse events (AE), leading to discontinuation, were reported in 8.5% of the ENT and 13.9% of the CBG treated patients. Nausea was the most common AE in each group, corresponding figures being 7.3% with ENT and 25.3% with CBG (P=0.0024). A probable or possible causal relationship with ENT was reported in 41% and with CBG in 64% of the AE. Among these, only one serious AE (dehydration) was recorded with each treatment group. ENT and CBG reduced the patient's motor complications effectively and to a similar degree. The clinical benefit was more quickly apparent with ENT, which also showed a more favorable AE profile than CBG.
在这项为期12周的多中心、随机、开放标签、评估者盲法研究中,对161例出现剂末现象的老年帕金森病患者比较了恩他卡朋(ENT)或卡麦角林(CBG)联合左旋多巴的疗效和耐受性。患者每日接受3至5次ENT治疗,或根据需要滴定CBG,最大剂量为6毫克/天。两个治疗组的每日“关”期(主要疗效变量)均显著减少近2小时。尽管有倾向于ENT的趋势,但非劣效性检验未通过。与接受CBG治疗的患者相比,接受ENT治疗的患者“关”期缩短更快。统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第二部分和第三部分下降了约20%,两组之间无差异。ENT组43%的患者在基线时报告有异动症,最后一次访视时为35%。CBG组相应的数据分别为46%和43%。用帕金森病问卷-39(PDQ-39)测量的生活质量,ENT和CBG均显著提高。最后一次访视时,ENT的平均每日剂量为698毫克(加447毫克左旋多巴),CBG为3.45毫克(加475毫克左旋多巴)。接受ENT治疗的患者中有8.5%、接受CBG治疗的患者中有13.9%报告了导致停药的不良事件(AE)。恶心是每组中最常见的AE,ENT组为7.3%,CBG组为25.3%(P = .0024)。41%的AE报告与ENT可能或可能存在因果关系,64%与CBG有关。其中,每个治疗组仅记录到1例严重AE(脱水)。ENT和CBG有效降低了患者的运动并发症,程度相似。ENT的临床益处更迅速显现,其AE情况也比CBG更有利。