Suppr超能文献

噻托溴铵干粉吸入剂与压力定量气雾剂治疗哮喘的长期疗效和安全性比较

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ipratropium Bromide plus Fenoterol via Respimat((R)) Soft Misttrade mark Inhaler (SMI) versus a Pressurised Metered-Dose Inhaler in Asthma.

机构信息

Academic Hospital, University of Brussels (AZVUB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(1):17-28. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424010-00003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Respimat((R)) Soft Misttrade mark Inhaler (SMI) is a novel, propellant-free device that significantly increases lung deposition compared with pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual((R))) delivered via Respimat((R)) SMI and via a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-driven pMDI (CFC-MDI) in patients with asthma.

DESIGN

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel- group study.

PATIENTS

631 patients (18-65 years old) with stable asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

After a 2-week run-in period (IB/FEN 20mug/50mug via CFC-MDI, two actuations four times a day), patients were randomised to 12 weeks' treatment with one of five treatments: IB/FEN 10mug/25mug, 20mug/50mug or placebo via Respimat((R)) SMI (one actuation four times a day), or IB/FEN 20mug/50mug or placebo via CFC-MDI (two actuations four times a day). The main efficacy measure was lung function (assessed on days 1, 29, 57 and 85); safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.

RESULTS

Bronchodilator responses to IB/FEN were much greater than those to placebo (mean peak increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] on day 85: 0.498-0.521L, active treatment; 0.215 and 0.240L, placebo). According to the primary endpoint, i.e. the average change in FEV(1) from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on day 85, neither IB/FEN dosage via Respimat((R)) SMI was inferior to IB/FEN via pMDI (p < 0.001). Non-inferiority of the two Respimat((R)) SMI dosages was supported by analyses of other lung function measures, e.g. average change in FEV(1) from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on the other 3 test days, and peak FEV(1) on all test days. Overall, the safety profile of IB/FEN via Respimat((R)) SMI was comparable to that via CFC-MDI.

CONCLUSION

IB/FEN from Respimat((R)) SMI is as effective and safe as from CFC-MDI and enables a 2- to 4-fold daily dose reduction of IB/FEN.

摘要

目的

Respimat((R)) 软雾吸入器(SMI)是一种新型的无推进剂装置,与压力定量吸入器(pMDI)相比,它能显著增加肺部沉积。本研究旨在比较布地奈德/福莫特罗氢溴酸盐(IB/FEN;Berodual((R)))经 Respimat((R)) SMI 和经氯氟烃(CFC)驱动的 pMDI(CFC-MDI)给药在哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。

设计

多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究。

患者

631 例(18-65 岁)稳定期哮喘患者。

干预

经过 2 周的导入期(CFC-MDI 给予 IB/FEN20mug/50mug,每天 4 次,每次 2 次),患者随机接受 12 周的治疗,分为 5 种治疗方案之一:Respimat((R)) SMI 给予 IB/FEN10mug/25mug、20mug/50mug 或安慰剂(每天 4 次,每次 1 次),或 CFC-MDI 给予 IB/FEN20mug/50mug 或安慰剂(每天 4 次,每次 2 次)。主要疗效指标为肺功能(在第 1、29、57 和 85 天评估);安全性通过监测不良事件进行评估。

结果

IB/FEN 的支气管扩张作用明显大于安慰剂(第 85 天用力呼气量第一秒的平均峰值增加[FEV1]:0.498-0.521L,活性治疗;0.215 和 0.240L,安慰剂)。根据主要终点,即第 85 天给药后 6 小时内 FEV1 从试验日基线的平均变化,IB/FEN 经 Respimat((R)) SMI 给药的两种剂量均不劣于 IB/FEN 经 pMDI 给药(p < 0.001)。Respimat((R)) SMI 的两种剂量均具有非劣效性,这得到了其他肺功能指标的分析支持,例如在其他 3 个试验日给药后 6 小时内 FEV1 从试验日基线的平均变化,以及所有试验日的最大 FEV1。总体而言,IB/FEN 经 Respimat((R)) SMI 给药的安全性与 CFC-MDI 给药相当。

结论

布地奈德/福莫特罗氢溴酸盐经 Respimat((R)) SMI 给药与经 CFC-MDI 给药同样有效且安全,并且能够使布地奈德/福莫特罗氢溴酸盐的每日剂量减少 2 至 4 倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验