Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(2):89-101. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424020-00004.
To monitor the safety and efficacy profile of long-term treatment with diclofenac, nabumetone, meloxicam and celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
This randomised, prospective clinical trial included a total of 461 subjects (313 females and 148 males) with clinically diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Their average age was 46.9 +/- 14.4 years (range 20-69 years), and the average disease duration was 1333.7 +/- 992.85 days. Subjects were randomly assigned daily administration of one of the following: diclofenac 75-100mg, meloxicam 15mg, nabumetone 1000mg or celecoxib 200mg. During the 6-month treatment period, a monthly patient interview was conducted to evaluate drug efficacy and safety.
407 subjects successfully completed the 6-month treatment. Sixteen patients (12.2%) withdrew from the diclofenac group, 16 (12.2%) from the nabumetone group, 17 (11.8%) from the meloxicam group and five (9.1%) from the celecoxib group. Most withdrawals occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. Reasons for withdrawals in the first three groups were lack of efficacy (44.9%) and adverse effects (38.8%). For the celecoxib group, high cost (80%) was the main reason for withdrawal. Adverse drug reactions to NSAIDs mostly occurred at an early stage of treatment, with an incidence rate of 31.9% for the diclofenac group, 19.9% for the nabumetone group, 25.2% for the meloxicam group, and 7.27% for the celecoxib group. Clinical efficacy rates for the four NSAIDs were positively related to the length of treatment. During the first 4 months, diclofenac, meloxicam and celecoxib showed better efficacy than nabumetone. There were no significant differences in efficacy during the fifth and sixth months. The overall 6-month effectiveness rates were 68.8% for diclofenac, 59.8% for nabumetone, 67.6% for meloxicam and 69.1% for celecoxib.
Adverse drug reactions and their related withdrawals occurred mostly at an early stage of NSAID treatment, so it is crucial to strengthen pharmacovigilance during this period. Among the investigated NSAIDs, celecoxib did not prove to be superior to diclofenac, nabumetone or meloxicam with respect to its efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; however, it did show good patient compliance and safety profiles.
监测长期使用双氯芬酸、萘丁美酮、美洛昔康和塞来昔布治疗类风湿关节炎患者的安全性和疗效概况。
这是一项随机、前瞻性临床试验,共纳入 461 例(313 名女性和 148 名男性)临床诊断为类风湿关节炎的患者。他们的平均年龄为 46.9±14.4 岁(年龄 20-69 岁),平均病程为 1333.7±992.85 天。受试者随机每日服用以下药物之一:双氯芬酸 75-100mg、美洛昔康 15mg、萘丁美酮 1000mg 或塞来昔布 200mg。在 6 个月的治疗期间,每月对患者进行一次访谈,以评估药物的疗效和安全性。
407 例患者成功完成了 6 个月的治疗。16 例(12.2%)患者从双氯芬酸组退出,16 例(12.2%)从萘丁美酮组退出,17 例(11.8%)从美洛昔康组退出,5 例(9.1%)从塞来昔布组退出。大多数退出发生在治疗的前 3 个月。前三组退出的原因是疗效不佳(44.9%)和不良反应(38.8%)。对于塞来昔布组,高成本(80%)是主要退出原因。非甾体抗炎药的药物不良反应主要发生在治疗的早期,双氯芬酸组的发生率为 31.9%,萘丁美酮组为 19.9%,美洛昔康组为 25.2%,塞来昔布组为 7.27%。四种非甾体抗炎药的临床疗效与治疗时间呈正相关。在前 4 个月,双氯芬酸、美洛昔康和塞来昔布的疗效优于萘丁美酮。在第 5 和第 6 个月,疗效无显著差异。整体 6 个月的有效率为:双氯芬酸 68.8%,萘丁美酮 59.8%,美洛昔康 67.6%,塞来昔布 69.1%。
非甾体抗炎药治疗的早期不良反应及其相关停药主要发生,因此在此期间加强药物警戒至关重要。在所研究的非甾体抗炎药中,塞来昔布在治疗类风湿关节炎方面的疗效并不优于双氯芬酸、萘丁美酮或美洛昔康,但它具有良好的患者依从性和安全性。