Furst Daniel E, Kolba Karen S, Fleischmann Roy, Silverfield Joel, Greenwald Maria, Roth Sanford, Hall David B, Roszko Paul J
Virginia Mason Research Center Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;29(3):436-46.
This Phase III, placebo and active controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg daily for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
A 12 week, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel group trial compared daily oral meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg to placebo (negative control) and diclofenac 75 mg BID (positive control). A total of 894 patients (18 years of age with confirmed RA who flared following an NSAID-free period) were randomized to be treated. Baseline scores for all endpoints were similar among the treatment groups. Patient assessments were at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks or early termination.
All treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.001). Meloxicam 7.5 and 22.5 mg was significantly superior to placebo in all 5 primary efficacy endpoints (swollen joint count, tender joint count, patient pain, patient and physician global; all p < 0.05). Diclofenac 150 mg was superior to placebo for 4 of 5 primary efficacy measures (all but swollen joint count; p < 0.05) and meloxicam 15 mg was superior for 3 of 5 primary endpoints (patient pain and patient and physician global). AUC of patient global, patient pain, and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire demonstrated dose-response (p < 0.04), while AUC ACR20 showed a qualitative trend in the same direction. The rate of gastrointestinal (GI) events during the 12 week trial for all doses of meloxicam and diclofenac did not differ significantly from placebo (23.2-32.0%). GI withdrawals were comparable and not significantly different across all treatment groups (4.3-5.7%).
This trial demonstrated a dose response relationship for meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg using AUC measurement of response for the treatment of RA. All 3 doses of meloxicam. and positive control, were effective in the treatment of RA. The overall incidence rate of GI events did not differ significantly from placebo in either the meloxicam treatment groups or the positive control.
本III期、安慰剂和活性对照、多中心试验评估了每日服用7.5、15和22.5毫克美洛昔康治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)的疗效和安全性。
一项为期12周的随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组试验,将每日口服7.5、15和22.5毫克美洛昔康与安慰剂(阴性对照)和双氯芬酸75毫克每日两次(阳性对照)进行比较。共有894名患者(年龄在18岁及以上,确诊为RA且在无NSAID治疗期后病情复发)被随机分组接受治疗。各治疗组所有终点的基线评分相似。患者在第0、2、4、8和12周或提前终止时进行评估。
所有治疗组与基线相比均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。在所有5个主要疗效终点(肿胀关节计数、压痛关节计数、患者疼痛、患者和医生整体评估;所有p < 0.05)方面,美洛昔康7.5毫克和22.5毫克组显著优于安慰剂组。双氯芬酸150毫克在5项主要疗效指标中的4项上优于安慰剂(除肿胀关节计数外;p < 0.05),美洛昔康15毫克在5项主要终点中的3项上优于安慰剂(患者疼痛以及患者和医生整体评估)。患者整体评估、患者疼痛和改良健康评估问卷的AUC显示出剂量反应关系(p < 0.04),而AUC ACR20显示出相同方向的定性趋势。在12周试验期间,所有剂量的美洛昔康和双氯芬酸的胃肠道(GI)事件发生率与安慰剂组相比无显著差异(23.2 - 32.0%)。所有治疗组的胃肠道相关停药情况相当,且无显著差异(4.3 - 5.7%)。
本试验通过对治疗RA的反应进行AUC测量,证明了美洛昔康7.5、15和22.5毫克存在剂量反应关系。美洛昔康的所有3个剂量以及阳性对照在治疗RA方面均有效。美洛昔康治疗组或阳性对照的胃肠道事件总体发生率与安慰剂组相比无显著差异。