• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院协调医生偏好项目选择的策略。

Hospitals' strategies for orchestrating selection of physician preference items.

作者信息

Montgomery Kathleen, Schneller Eugene S

机构信息

University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2007 Jun;85(2):307-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00489.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00489.x
PMID:17517118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2690325/
Abstract

This article analyzes hospitals' strategies to shape physicians' behavior and counter suppliers' power in purchasing physician preference items. Two models of standardization are limitations on the range of manufacturers or products (the "formulary" model) and price ceilings for particular item categories (the "payment-cap" model), both requiring processes to define product equivalencies often with inadequate product comparison data. The formulary model is more difficult to implement because of physicians' resistance to top-down dictates. The payment-cap model is more feasible because it preserves physicians' choice while also restraining manufacturers' power. Hospitals may influence physicians' involvement through a process of orchestration that includes committing to improve clinical facilities, scheduling, and training and fostering a culture of mutual trust and respect.

摘要

本文分析了医院塑造医生行为以及在购买医生偏好项目时对抗供应商势力的策略。两种标准化模式分别是对制造商或产品范围的限制(“处方集”模式)以及对特定项目类别的价格上限(“支付上限”模式),这两种模式都需要定义产品等效性的流程,而产品比较数据往往不足。由于医生抵制自上而下的指令,“处方集”模式更难实施。“支付上限”模式更可行,因为它在保留医生选择权的同时也限制了制造商的势力。医院可以通过精心安排的流程来影响医生的参与,这一流程包括致力于改善临床设施、日程安排和培训,并营造相互信任和尊重的文化。

相似文献

1
Hospitals' strategies for orchestrating selection of physician preference items.医院协调医生偏好项目选择的策略。
Milbank Q. 2007 Jun;85(2):307-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00489.x.
2
Lower supply costs, higher quality. Working with your medical staff on physician preference items. Panel discussion.降低供应成本,提高质量。与您的医务人员就医生偏好项目进行合作。小组讨论。
Mod Healthc. 2006 Mar 27;36(13):58-61.
3
Just what the doctor ordered.正是医生所吩咐的。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2003 Jul;57(7):70-4.
4
Reducing costs and preserving physician choice: creating a partnership that works.降低成本并保留医生的选择权:建立有效的合作关系。
J Cardiovasc Manag. 1994 Jul-Aug;5(4):33-7.
5
Successful purchasing strategies involve radiology administrators, materiel managers and suppliers.成功的采购策略涉及放射科管理人员、物资经理和供应商。
Radiol Manage. 1993 Spring;15(2):31-4.
6
The cost management organization: the next step for materiel management.成本管理组织:物资管理的下一步举措。
J Healthc Resour Manag. 1997 Jun;15(5):11-8.
7
Trust between managers and physicians in community hospitals: the effects of power over hospital decisions.社区医院中管理者与医生之间的信任:对医院决策权力的影响
J Healthc Manag. 1998 Sep-Oct;43(5):397-414; discussion 415.
8
Medical staff organizations: a persistent anomaly.医务人员组织:一种持续存在的反常现象。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):w76-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w76. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
9
Developing profitable purchasing strategies.制定盈利性采购策略。
J Bus Strategy. 1988 Jan-Feb;9(1):48-51.
10
Five successful methods to control spending on physician preference items.控制医生偏好项目支出的五种成功方法。
Hosp Mater Manage. 2007 Mar;32(3):1-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How to objectively evaluate the impact of image-guided surgery technologies.如何客观评估影像引导手术技术的影响。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Aug;51(10):2869-2877. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.收集医师对医疗器械的偏好:我们做对了吗?意大利骨科医生使用 2 种不同的陈述偏好方法得出的证据。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):886-900. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231201805. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
3
Random effects modelling logistic regression for the inclusion of cluster-level covariates in propensity score estimation: A Monte Carlo simulation and registry cohort analysis.用于在倾向得分估计中纳入聚类水平协变量的随机效应建模逻辑回归:蒙特卡罗模拟和登记队列分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 23;14:988605. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.988605. eCollection 2023.
4
Examining the Factors Influencing Orthopedic Physician's Decision to Purchase Medical Devices: Evidence from Kuwait.探究影响骨科医生购买医疗设备决策的因素:来自科威特的证据。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Mar 1;15:37-58. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S343591. eCollection 2022.
5
Hospital management practices and medical device costs.医院管理实践与医疗器械成本。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):227-236. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13898. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
6
Motivations Influencing the Surgeon's Healthcare Unit Choice to Perform Surgery: A Confirmatory Study in Portugal.影响外科医生选择医疗单位进行手术的动机:葡萄牙的一项验证性研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2019 Oct 24;10(1):143-158. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010013.
7
Analysing actual prices of medical products: a cross-sectional survey of Dutch hospitals.分析医疗产品实际价格:荷兰医院的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e035174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035174.
8
Association of Cost Savings and Surgical Quality With Single-Vendor Procurement for Spinal Implants.脊柱植入物单一供应商采购与成本节约和手术质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915567. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15567.
9
Development and pilot of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool for health services administrators.开发并试行用于卫生服务管理人员的多准则决策分析(MCDA)工具。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e025752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025752.
10
Should a surgeon comply with hospital administration's demand to change valve preference?外科医生应该遵守医院管理部门更换瓣膜偏好的要求吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;156(6):2210-2215. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.044. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Trend shows growing orthopedic surgery case load. Will surgeons be able to keep up?趋势显示骨科手术病例数量不断增加。外科医生能跟上吗?
Mater Manag Health Care. 2006 Jul;15(7):61-2.
2
Squandering the gain: gainsharing and the continuing dilemma of physician financial incentives.挥霍所得:收益分享与医生经济激励的持续困境
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2003 Fall;98(1):145-238.
3
Possible conflicts for doctors are seen on medical devices.医生在医疗设备方面可能存在利益冲突。
N Y Times Web. 2005 Sep 22:A1, C6.
4
Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups.评估激励措施对医生和医疗团体的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):80S-118S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267507.
5
Something old, something new: recent developments in hospital-physician relationships.旧貌新颜:医院与医生关系的最新发展
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 2):471-88. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00125.
6
Analyzing qualitative data with computer software.使用计算机软件分析定性数据。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1241-63.
7
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.提高定性分析的质量和可信度。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208.
8
How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.当我们看到“好的”定性研究时,我们如何识别它?开启卫生服务研究中的对话。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88.
9
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?定性方法:它们是什么以及为何要使用它们?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
10
Managing professional work: three models of control for health organizations.管理专业工作:卫生组织的三种控制模式。
Health Serv Res. 1982 Fall;17(3):213-40.