• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估激励措施对医生和医疗团体的影响。

Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups.

作者信息

Town Robert, Wholey Douglas R, Kralewski John, Dowd Bryan

机构信息

University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):80S-118S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267507.

DOI:10.1177/1077558704267507
PMID:15375286
Abstract

This article describes issues that should be considered in the development of a theory or theories about incentives from which testable hypotheses could be derived. Economic, psychological, and organizational theories are described, and issues that should be considered in hypothesis generation are presented. Psychological factors influencing incentives include decision framing, regret, heuristics, and reinforcements. Organizational factors influencing incentives include bundling of services or people, matching of incentive structure with work organization, and the incompletely contained hierarchical nesting of incentives. Finally, the dynamics of incentive change are considered, with a focus on describing the conditions under which physicians and physician organizations respond to incentive changes.

摘要

本文描述了在构建一个或多个关于激励措施的理论时应考虑的问题,这些理论应能推导出可检验的假设。文中介绍了经济、心理和组织理论,并提出了假设生成过程中应考虑的问题。影响激励措施的心理因素包括决策框架、遗憾、启发法和强化。影响激励措施的组织因素包括服务或人员的捆绑、激励结构与工作组织的匹配,以及激励措施不完全包含的层级嵌套。最后,本文探讨了激励措施变化的动态过程,重点描述了医生和医生组织对激励措施变化做出反应的条件。

相似文献

1
Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups.评估激励措施对医生和医疗团体的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):80S-118S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267507.
2
Penetrating the "black box": financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services.穿透“黑匣子”:提高医生服务质量的经济激励措施
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):37S-68S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704266770.
3
Assessing the influence of incentives on physician and medical groups: a comment.评估激励措施对医生和医疗集团的影响:一则评论
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):119S-23S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267511.
4
Individual incentives to fix organizational problems?解决组织问题的个人激励措施?
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):76S-9S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267506.
5
Framing the public policy questions: financial incentives for efficiency and effectiveness.构建公共政策问题:提高效率和效益的经济激励措施
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):31S-6S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704266769.
6
Physician-focused option shows savings.以医生为中心的方案显示出节省成本的效果。
Dis Manag Advis. 2007 Nov;13(11):125-9, 121.
7
Commentary on "Penetrating the 'black box': financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services," by Douglas A. Conrad and Jon B. Christianson.对道格拉斯·A·康拉德和乔恩·B·克里斯蒂安森所著的《穿透“黑匣子”:提高医生服务质量的经济激励措施》的评论
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):69S-75S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704267505.
8
Support for smoking cessation interventions in physician organizations: results from a national study.医师组织中戒烟干预措施的支持情况:一项全国性研究的结果
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1396-406. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100585.27288.CD.
9
The response of physician groups to P4P incentives.医生群体对按绩效付费激励措施的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 May;13(5):249-55.
10
Increasing value: a research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care delivery in the United States.提升价值:应对美国医疗服务中管理与组织挑战的研究议程
Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3 Suppl):12S-30S. doi: 10.1177/1077558704266768.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care providers' preferences for pay-for-performance programs: a discrete choice experiment study in Shandong China.基层医疗服务提供者对按绩效付费项目的偏好:来自中国山东的一项离散选择实验研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Mar 12;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00903-2.
2
Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study.比较选定国家初级保健中按绩效付费(P4P)计划:一项比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09841-6.
3
Effects of fee-for-service, diagnosis-related-group, and mixed payment systems on physicians' medical service behavior: experimental evidence.
按服务项目付费、按诊断相关分组付费和混合付费制度对医生医疗服务行为的影响:实验证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08218-5.
4
Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes by Health Systems and Physician Practices in the USA.美国卫生系统和医生实践中患者报告结局的采用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3885-3892. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07631-0. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
How are pay-for-performance schemes in healthcare designed in low- and middle-income countries? Typology and systematic literature review.在中低收入国家,医疗保健领域的按绩效付费计划是如何设计的?类型学和系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05075-y.
6
A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes.一个用于描述医疗保健绩效薪酬计划设计的报告框架以及用于对其进行分类和分析的类型学。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3479-x.
7
Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review.眼科绩效薪酬的特征与效果:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2333-x.
8
The differential effect of compensation structures on the likelihood that firms accept new patients by insurance type.薪酬结构对企业按保险类型接受新患者可能性的差异影响。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Mar;16(1):65-88. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9182-0. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
Barriers to Choosing Wisely® in Primary Care: It's Not Just About "the Money".基层医疗中明智选择(Choosing Wisely®)的障碍:这不仅仅关乎“金钱”。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Feb;32(2):140-142. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3916-7.
10
Physician Motivation: Listening to What Pay-for-Performance Programs and Quality Improvement Collaboratives Are Telling Us.医生的动机:倾听绩效薪酬计划和质量改进协作组织告诉我们的内容。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Nov;41(11):522-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41069-4.