Fernandez M I, Watson P J, Rowbotham D J
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):266-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem129. Epub 2007 May 22.
Pulsed magnetic field therapy (PMFT) is a non-invasive, simple technique used extensively for the treatment of muscle pain. However, evidence to support its use from well-designed, clinical, or experimental studies is sparse.
We have utilized an acute pain model to perform a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover-study on 10 male (18-40 yr) volunteers. Pain was elicited by infusion of hypertonic saline 5% into the brachioradialis muscle of the non-dominant arm on two occasions, at least 1 week apart. Subjects received active or sham PMFT for 30 min in a randomized order delivered by two identical, commercially available machines (PulsePack 6000, Quantum Techniks). The active machine delivered a M-wave magnetic pulse (1.25 Hz, 3 ms width, 600 Gauss); the sham device was deactivated and delivered no magnetic energy. Pain was assessed at 15-s intervals, and area under the visual analogue score (VAS) pain curve (AUCp) was calculated using the trapezoid method.
There were no significant differences in mean VAS pain scores between the two machines at any time. In addition, there were no significant differences with respect to mean (sem) maximum pain score [sham 60 (8), active 63 (9) mm; P = 0.66, 95% CI -18 to 12 mm] or AUCp [sham 463 (50), active 499 (90); P = 0.64, 95% CI -201 to 129].
We conclude that, using the electromagnetic characteristics of the machine in this study, the PMFT had no effect on pain in our experimental model. More work is required to provide an evidence base in support of the use of this technique for pain.
脉冲磁场疗法(PMFT)是一种广泛用于治疗肌肉疼痛的非侵入性、简单技术。然而,来自精心设计的临床或实验研究以支持其使用的证据却很稀少。
我们利用急性疼痛模型,对10名男性(18 - 40岁)志愿者进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究。通过两次向非优势手臂的肱桡肌注射5%高渗盐水诱发疼痛,两次注射间隔至少1周。受试者以随机顺序接受30分钟的主动或假PMFT,由两台相同的商用机器(PulsePack 6000,Quantum Techniks)提供。主动机器发出M波磁脉冲(1.25赫兹,3毫秒宽度,600高斯);假装置未激活,不释放磁能。每隔15秒评估一次疼痛,并使用梯形法计算视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛曲线下的面积(AUCp)。
两台机器在任何时间的平均VAS疼痛评分均无显著差异。此外,平均(标准误)最大疼痛评分[假治疗组60(8),主动治疗组63(9)毫米;P = 0.66,95%可信区间-18至12毫米]或AUCp[假治疗组463(50),主动治疗组499(90);P = 0.64,95%可信区间-201至129]也无显著差异。
我们得出结论,在本研究中,利用该机器的电磁特性,PMFT对我们实验模型中的疼痛没有影响。需要开展更多工作以提供支持该技术用于疼痛治疗的证据基础。