Nagata Koichi, Endo Shungo, Tatsukawa Kishiko, Kudo Shin-ei
Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Chigasaki-chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, 224-8503, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):379-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9415-5. Epub 2007 May 24.
In colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, precise tumor localization is important for oncologically correct surgery and adequate tumor and lymph node resection margins. During laparoscopic surgery it is difficult to localize early CRC. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of two tumor localization techniques; intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography.
Seventeen patients with CRC necessitating preoperative marking were alternately allocated to either the fluoroscopy (F) group (n = 8) or the laparoscopic ultrasonography (LU) group (n = 9). A three-step technique was used. At first lesions were localized preoperatively by metallic clips that were colonoscopically applied proximally and distally to the tumor site. Second, computed tomography (CT) colonography was taken to obtain preoperative staging. The location of the metallic clips was confirmed by CT colonography, preoperatively. Third, in the F group, intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed to localize the applied clips. In the LU group, the applied clips were detected from the serosal aspect of the colon using intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography.
In all patients, colonoscopic metallic clips were successfully applied and preoperative CT colonography correctly detected the location of the tumor. Marking sites were detected precisely using intraoperative fluoroscopy or intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography in all cases, without complications. The mean detection time was 15.8 minutes in the F group and 7.0 minutes in the LU group (p = 0.005). In the LU group, two cases were technically difficult because of interruption of the ultrasound by intestinal air.
Both intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography are safe and accurate techniques for intraoperative localization of early CRC. With regard to detection time, intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography is superior to intraoperative fluoroscopy. However, when there is a massive amount of intestinal air, intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography is cumbersome in localizing the lesion. Computed tomography colonography is useful for preoperative tumor localization and might be effective for shortening detection time during surgery.
在结直肠癌(CRC)手术中,精确的肿瘤定位对于肿瘤学上正确的手术以及足够的肿瘤和淋巴结切除边缘至关重要。在腹腔镜手术中,早期结直肠癌的定位很困难。本研究的目的是比较两种肿瘤定位技术的有效性;术中荧光透视和术中腹腔镜超声检查。
17例需要术前标记的结直肠癌患者被交替分配到荧光透视(F)组(n = 8)或腹腔镜超声检查(LU)组(n = 9)。采用三步技术。首先,术前通过结肠镜在肿瘤部位近端和远端应用金属夹来定位病变。其次,进行计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠成像以获得术前分期。术前通过CT结肠成像确认金属夹的位置。第三,在F组中,进行术中荧光透视以定位应用的夹子。在LU组中,使用术中腹腔镜超声检查从结肠浆膜面检测应用的夹子。
在所有患者中,结肠镜金属夹均成功应用,术前CT结肠成像正确检测到肿瘤位置。在所有病例中,使用术中荧光透视或术中腹腔镜超声检查均能精确检测标记部位,且无并发症。F组的平均检测时间为15.8分钟,LU组为7.0分钟(p = 0.005)。在LU组中,有2例因肠道气体干扰超声而在技术上存在困难。
术中荧光透视和术中腹腔镜超声检查都是早期结直肠癌术中定位的安全准确技术。在检测时间方面,术中腹腔镜超声检查优于术中荧光透视。然而,当存在大量肠道气体时,术中腹腔镜超声检查在定位病变时很麻烦。CT结肠成像对于术前肿瘤定位有用,并且可能有助于缩短手术中的检测时间。