• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜任务执行的计算机化分析。

A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.

作者信息

Narula Vimal K, Watson William C, Davis S Scott, Hinshaw Kristen, Needleman Bradley J, Mikami Dean J, Hazey Jeffrey W, Winston John H, Muscarella P, Rubin Mike, Patel Vipul, Melvin W Scott

机构信息

Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2258-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0. Epub 2007 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0
PMID:17522931
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Robotic technology has been postulated to improve performance in advanced surgical skills. We utilized a novel computerized assessment system to objectively describe the technical enhancement in task performance comparing robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Advanced laparoscopic surgeons (2-10 yrs experience) performed three unique task modules using laparoscopic and Telerobotic surgical instrumentation (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Performance was evaluated using a computerized assessment system (ProMIS, Dublin, Ireland) and results were recorded as time (s), path (mm) and precision. Each surgeon had an initial training session followed by two testing sessions for each module. A paired Student's t-test was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Ten surgeons completed the study. 8/10 surgeons had significant technical enhancement utilizing robotic technology.

CONCLUSIONS

The ProMIS computerized assessment system can be modified to objectively obtain task performance data with robotic instrumentation. All the tasks were performed faster and with more precision using the robotic technology than standard laparoscopy.

摘要

引言

机器人技术被认为可以提高高级手术技能的表现。我们使用了一种新型的计算机化评估系统,以客观描述在比较机器人和腹腔镜器械时任务执行中的技术提升。

方法与步骤

经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生(2 - 10年经验)使用腹腔镜和远程机器人手术器械(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔市)执行三个独特的任务模块。使用计算机化评估系统(ProMIS,爱尔兰都柏林)评估表现,结果记录为时间(秒)、路径(毫米)和精度。每位外科医生都有一次初始培训课程,随后针对每个模块进行两次测试课程。使用配对学生t检验分析数据。

结果

十名外科医生完成了研究。8/10的外科医生在使用机器人技术时技术有显著提升。

结论

ProMIS计算机化评估系统可以进行修改,以客观获取使用机器人器械时的任务表现数据。与标准腹腔镜检查相比,使用机器人技术执行所有任务的速度更快且精度更高。

相似文献

1
A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.机器人与腹腔镜任务执行的计算机化分析。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2258-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0. Epub 2007 May 24.
2
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.专家和新手腹腔镜与机器人辅助缝合性能比较。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.标准器械与两种手术机器人系统之间腹腔镜技能操作的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):574-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8938-z. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
4
Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助手术任务执行中的精度和速度比较。
J Surg Res. 2018 Mar;223:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.037. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.使用具有人体工程学手柄的机器人驱动腹腔镜持针器的初步经验:评估外科医生的任务绩效和人体工程学。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Dec;12(12):2069-2077. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1636-z. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
Robotic surgery and resident training.机器人手术与住院医师培训。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):960-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8745-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
7
Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.对有经验进行高级腹腔镜手术的执业外科医生进行心理运动技能评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Sep;197(3):479-88. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00535-0.
8
Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training.虚拟现实与混合模拟在机器人手术培训中的随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(10):1652-6; discussion 1657. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10060.x. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
9
Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.使用一种新型腹腔镜缝合任务对ProMIS模拟器进行结构效度验证。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8274-6. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
10
Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci surgical system.智商、电脑游戏技能、一般灵活性和腹腔镜经验对达芬奇手术系统操作表现的影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2009 Sep;5(3):327-31. doi: 10.1002/rcs.264.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-Time Tool Localization for Laparoscopic Surgery Using Convolutional Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络的腹腔镜手术实时工具定位
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;24(13):4191. doi: 10.3390/s24134191.
2
Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms.新手学习者的技能转移和学习曲线:机器人和腹腔镜平台的随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8483-8488. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10486-z. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
3
Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.使用一种新型腹腔镜缝合任务对ProMIS模拟器进行结构效度验证。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1227-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8274-6. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
2
Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.机器人手术:通过客观测量技能来确定学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1744-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
机器人辅助与视频辅助胸腹腔镜 McKeown 食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:微创方法的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1289-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01367-z. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
A direct comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hernia repair: patient-reported outcomes and cost analysis.机器人与腹腔镜疝修补术的直接比较:患者报告的结果和成本分析。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1115-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01943-7. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 23;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0727-4.
6
Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon's perspective?从外科医生的角度来看,机器人辅助手术相对于腹腔镜手术有哪些优势?
J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):79-82. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0144-8. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
7
Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance.将ProMIS手术模拟器作为机器人任务性能的客观测量方法的初步验证。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):195-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0256-9. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
8
Surgeon activity in robotic versus abdominal gynecologic surgery.机器人与腹部妇科手术中的外科医生活动。
J Robot Surg. 2012 Dec;6(4):333-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0317-0. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study.长时间机器人手术和腹腔镜手术期间及术后累积疲劳的比较:一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1119-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5076-6. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci(®) Surgical System.使用达芬奇(®)手术系统进行机器人缝合时,专家级和非专家级腹腔镜外科医生的学习曲线
J Robot Surg. 2013 Mar;7(1):29-34. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0336-5. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
标准器械与两种手术机器人系统之间腹腔镜技能操作的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):574-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8938-z. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
4
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?机器人手术技能与腹腔镜手术技能的比较:学习曲线是否存在差异?
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):39-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01717-x.
5
The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery.腹腔镜手术的陷阱:机器人手术和远程机器人手术面临的挑战。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb;12(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00001.
6
Computer-enhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery.计算机辅助与标准腹腔镜抗反流手术对比
J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;6(1):11-5; discussion 15-6. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00032-4.
7
Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks.在执行标准化任务时,手动与机器人辅助(宙斯系统)腹腔镜手术的效率比较。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9012-y. Epub 2001 Nov 16.
8
Anastomotic complications in minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting.微创冠状动脉搭桥术中的吻合口并发症
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Jun;63(6 Suppl):S64-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00416-5.
9
Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术的技能获取与评估
Arch Surg. 1997 Feb;132(2):200-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021.
10
Laparoscopic skills enhancement.腹腔镜技能提升
Am J Surg. 1996 Oct;172(4):377-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00186-9.