Moerman Daniel E
University of Michigan-Dearborn, 6515 Cherry Hill Road Ypsilanti, MI 48198, USA.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2007 Jul 25;112(3):451-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
This study provides a critical perspective on "informant agreement (consensus) analysis" as it is used in ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. It recasts the concept at a higher cultural level, and it describes the cultural agreement about reported medicinal plant use for the native peoples of North America. It examines some plant use categories around which there is significant cross cultural agreement, and some categories which lack such agreement. The study then proposes a theoretical approach to understanding the efficacy of plants lacking significant consensus in their usage. The study considers the implications of this second form of efficacy defined here as the "meaning response", but often referred to as the "placebo effect".
本研究对民族植物学和民族药理学中使用的“信息提供者共识分析”提供了批判性观点。它在更高的文化层面重塑了这一概念,并描述了北美原住民关于所报告药用植物使用的文化共识。它考察了一些存在显著跨文化共识的植物使用类别,以及一些缺乏此类共识的类别。该研究随后提出了一种理论方法,以理解在使用上缺乏显著共识的植物的功效。该研究考虑了这里定义为“意义反应”但通常被称为“安慰剂效应”的这种第二种功效形式的影响。