• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过数字图像分析确定,在Gleason分级模式3、4和5之间以及内部,核结构存在显著差异。

Significant variations in nuclear structure occur between and within Gleason grading patterns 3, 4, and 5 determined by digital image analysis.

作者信息

Veltri Robert W, Marlow Cameron, Khan Masood A, Miller Michael C, Epstein Jonathan I, Partin Alan W

机构信息

Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Prostate. 2007 Aug 1;67(11):1202-10. doi: 10.1002/pros.20614.

DOI:10.1002/pros.20614
PMID:17525934
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alterations in nuclei structure and DNA content captured from Gleason grading patterns 3, 4 and 5 of radical prostatectomy (RP) cases were determined by a computer-assisted microscope. Quantitative Nuclear Morphometry (QNM) profiles were created to evaluate variability in nuclear structure within each of these grades.

METHODS

A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed using RP cases and the prostate cancer (PCa) TMA cores prepared from 20 GG-3, 9 GG-4, 10 GG-5 patterns, and 20 benign cancer-adjacent cases from RP archival paraffin blocks. Feulgen-stained nuclei were captured from 0.6 mm spots using the AutoCyte system. Pools of 1100 nuclei captured from each test group were used to calculate Multivariate Logistic Regression (MLR) models that generated predictive indices and predictive probabilities (PP) to make comparisons between and within each set of pooled nuclei.

RESULTS

A single QNM profiles yielded areas of receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) that distinguished differences among benign cancer-adjacent nuclei and GG-3 (ROC-AUC = 0.78); GG-4 (ROC-AUC = 0.86) and GG-5 (ROC-AUC = 0.88) with accuracies of 73%, 78% and 80% respectively. Applying PP plots generated from MLR models of GG 3, 4, and 5 nuclei clearly demonstrated marked heterogeneity within each of these three GG patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

QNM signatures illustrate alterations in nuclei structure, based upon nuclear morphometry within each of these three GG patterns, and might signify potential variations in PCa disease risk of progression outcomes. In the future a modified system of Gleason grading that considers not only glandular architecture but also quantitative nuclear grade may ensure accuracy in prognosis.

摘要

背景

通过计算机辅助显微镜确定从根治性前列腺切除术(RP)病例的Gleason分级模式3、4和5中捕获的细胞核结构和DNA含量的改变。创建定量核形态计量学(QNM)图谱以评估这些分级中每个分级内细胞核结构的变异性。

方法

使用RP病例构建组织微阵列(TMA),并从RP存档石蜡块中制备前列腺癌(PCa)TMA芯,其中包括20个Gleason分级3(GG-3)、9个GG-4、10个GG-5模式以及20个癌旁良性病例。使用AutoCyte系统从0.6毫米的斑点中捕获福尔根染色的细胞核。从每个测试组捕获的1100个细胞核池用于计算多变量逻辑回归(MLR)模型,该模型生成预测指数和预测概率(PP),以在每组合并的细胞核之间和内部进行比较。

结果

单个QNM图谱产生了区分癌旁良性细胞核与GG-3(ROC曲线下面积[AUC]=0.78)、GG-4(ROC-AUC=0.86)和GG-5(ROC-AUC=0.88)之间差异的受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)区域,准确率分别为73%、78%和80%。应用从GG 3、4和5细胞核的MLR模型生成的PP图清楚地显示了这三种GG模式中每一种模式内的明显异质性。

结论

QNM特征说明了基于这三种GG模式中每一种模式内的核形态计量学的细胞核结构改变,并且可能表明PCa疾病进展结果风险的潜在差异。未来,一种不仅考虑腺泡结构而且考虑定量核分级的改良Gleason分级系统可能确保预后的准确性。

相似文献

1
Significant variations in nuclear structure occur between and within Gleason grading patterns 3, 4, and 5 determined by digital image analysis.通过数字图像分析确定,在Gleason分级模式3、4和5之间以及内部,核结构存在显著差异。
Prostate. 2007 Aug 1;67(11):1202-10. doi: 10.1002/pros.20614.
2
Ability to predict metastasis based on pathology findings and alterations in nuclear structure of normal-appearing and cancer peripheral zone epithelium in the prostate.基于前列腺正常外观及癌周区上皮的病理结果和核结构改变预测转移的能力。
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 May 15;10(10):3465-73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0635.
3
Ability to predict biochemical progression using Gleason score and a computer-generated quantitative nuclear grade derived from cancer cell nuclei.利用Gleason评分和源自癌细胞核的计算机生成的定量核分级来预测生化进展的能力。
Urology. 1996 Nov;48(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00370-6.
4
Prediction of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in men with long-term follow-up postprostatectomy using quantitative nuclear morphometry.利用定量核形态测定法对前列腺切除术后长期随访男性的前列腺特异性抗原复发情况进行预测。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jan;17(1):102-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0175.
5
Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.核结构的定量改变可预测根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发男性的前列腺癌远处转移和死亡情况。
Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;98(12):2583-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11852.
6
Do we truly see what we think we see? The role of cognitive bias in pathological interpretation.我们真的看到了我们认为自己看到的东西吗?认知偏差在病理解释中的作用。
J Pathol. 2008 Oct;216(2):193-200. doi: 10.1002/path.2395.
7
Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading.基于网络的组织微阵列图像数据分析:通过前列腺癌Gleason分级进行的初始验证测试。
Hum Pathol. 2001 Apr;32(4):417-27. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.23517.
8
Does any correlation exist between the Gleason classification system and the computer-assisted microscope analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei features in human prostate adenocarcinoma?在人体前列腺腺癌中,Gleason分类系统与Feulgen染色细胞核特征的计算机辅助显微镜分析之间是否存在任何相关性?
Anal Cell Pathol. 1996 Dec;12(3):159-71.
9
Morphometric signature differences in nuclei of Gleason pattern 4 areas in Gleason 7 prostate cancer with differing primary grades on needle biopsy.在穿刺活检中具有不同原发分级的 Gleason 7 前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 区域细胞核的形态计量学特征差异。
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):88-93; discussion 93-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
10
Nuclear/Nucleolar morphometry and DNA image cytometry as a combined diagnostic tool in pathology of prostatic carcinoma.细胞核/核仁形态测定及DNA图像细胞计量术作为前列腺癌病理学的联合诊断工具
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Dec;20(4):537-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Grading of prostate cancer: a work in progress.前列腺癌分级:一项正在进行中的工作。
Histopathology. 2019 Jan;74(1):146-160. doi: 10.1111/his.13767.
2
PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.基于蛋白质和数字组织形态计量分析,PBOV1作为更晚期前列腺癌的潜在生物标志物。
Prostate. 2018 May;78(7):547-559. doi: 10.1002/pros.23499. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
[Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
[前列腺癌。第2部分:1966 - 2015年期间各种肿瘤分级系统回顾以及国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)新分级的未来展望]
Pathologe. 2016 Feb;37(1):11-6. doi: 10.1007/s00292-015-0124-x.
4
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer is associated with quantifiable changes in nuclear structure.前列腺癌中的上皮-间质转化与核结构的可量化变化相关。
Prostate. 2015 Feb;75(2):218-24. doi: 10.1002/pros.22908. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
5
Statistical Shape Model for Manifold Regularization: Gleason grading of prostate histology.用于流形正则化的统计形状模型:前列腺组织学的格里森分级
Comput Vis Image Underst. 2013 Sep 1;117(9):1138-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2012.11.011.
6
Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.核形态计量学、核组学与前列腺癌进展。
Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):375-84. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.148. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
7
The role of secreted frizzled-related protein 2 expression in prostate cancer.分泌卷曲相关蛋白 2 表达在前列腺癌中的作用。
Histopathology. 2011 Dec;59(6):1240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04073.x.
8
Valproic acid causes dose- and time-dependent changes in nuclear structure in prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.丙戊酸在体外和体内均会引起前列腺癌细胞的核结构发生剂量和时间依赖性变化。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 Apr;8(4):802-8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1076.
9
DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.DNA倍体作为活检Gleason评分的替代指标用于术前预测前列腺癌是否局限于器官或超出器官范围。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.060. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
10
p300 (histone acetyltransferase) biomarker predicts prostate cancer biochemical recurrence and correlates with changes in epithelia nuclear size and shape.p300(组蛋白乙酰转移酶)生物标志物可预测前列腺癌的生化复发,并与上皮细胞核大小和形状的变化相关。
Prostate. 2008 Jul 1;68(10):1097-104. doi: 10.1002/pros.20772.