Isharwal Sumit, Miller M Craig, Epstein Jonathan I, Mangold Leslie A, Humphreys Elizabeth, Partin Alan W, Veltri Robert W
James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-2101, USA.
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.060. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
Transformation of normal epithelium into cancer cells involves epigenetic and genetic changes and modifications in nuclear structure and tissue architecture. To evaluate nuclear morphometric alterations and clinicopathologic features for organ- vs nonorgan-confined prostate carcinoma (PCa) prediction.
Of 557 prospectively enrolled patients, 370 had complete information and sufficient tumor area for all evaluated parameters (281 organ-confined and 89 nonorgan-confined PCa cases). Digital images of Feulgen DNA-stained nuclei were captured from biopsies using the AutoCyte imaging system, and the nuclear morphometric alterations were calculated. Logistic regression analysis with bootstrap resampling was used to determine the factors important for differentiation of the 2 groups and to generate models for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.
Several nuclear morphometric features were significantly altered and could differentiate organ- and nonorgan-confined disease. DNA ploidy was the most important factor among the significant nuclear morphometric features and was the second most important factor for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction when considered with total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), complexed PSA, free/total PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage. The combination of DNA ploidy with clinical stage, total PSA, and biopsy Gleason score showed an improvement of 1.5% in the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves compared with the combination of clinical stage, total PSA, and biopsy Gleason (73.97% vs 72.43%). The use of DNA ploidy in lieu of the biopsy Gleason score in each preoperative model evaluated resulted in equivalent or improved organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.
The results of our study have shown that DNA ploidy can serve as a surrogate biomarker that has the potential to replace biopsy Gleason scores for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.
正常上皮细胞向癌细胞的转变涉及表观遗传和基因变化以及核结构和组织结构的改变。评估核形态计量学改变及临床病理特征,以预测器官局限性与非器官局限性前列腺癌(PCa)。
在557例前瞻性入组患者中,370例具有所有评估参数的完整信息及足够的肿瘤面积(281例器官局限性PCa病例和89例非器官局限性PCa病例)。使用AutoCyte成像系统从活检组织中获取福尔根DNA染色细胞核的数字图像,并计算核形态计量学改变。采用带自助重抽样的逻辑回归分析来确定区分两组的重要因素,并生成器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测模型。
几个核形态计量学特征有显著改变,可区分器官局限性和非器官局限性疾病。DNA倍体是显著核形态计量学特征中最重要的因素,在与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、复合PSA、游离/总PSA、活检Gleason评分及临床分期一起考虑时,是器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测的第二重要因素。与临床分期、总PSA和活检Gleason评分组合相比,DNA倍体与临床分期、总PSA和活检Gleason评分的组合在受试者操作特征曲线下面积提高了1.5%(73.97%对72.43%)。在每个评估的术前模型中,用DNA倍体代替活检Gleason评分可得到等效或更好的器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测结果。
我们的研究结果表明,DNA倍体可作为替代生物标志物,有潜力取代活检Gleason评分用于器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa的预测。