Suppr超能文献

DNA倍体作为活检Gleason评分的替代指标用于术前预测前列腺癌是否局限于器官或超出器官范围。

DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.

作者信息

Isharwal Sumit, Miller M Craig, Epstein Jonathan I, Mangold Leslie A, Humphreys Elizabeth, Partin Alan W, Veltri Robert W

机构信息

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-2101, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.060. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transformation of normal epithelium into cancer cells involves epigenetic and genetic changes and modifications in nuclear structure and tissue architecture. To evaluate nuclear morphometric alterations and clinicopathologic features for organ- vs nonorgan-confined prostate carcinoma (PCa) prediction.

METHODS

Of 557 prospectively enrolled patients, 370 had complete information and sufficient tumor area for all evaluated parameters (281 organ-confined and 89 nonorgan-confined PCa cases). Digital images of Feulgen DNA-stained nuclei were captured from biopsies using the AutoCyte imaging system, and the nuclear morphometric alterations were calculated. Logistic regression analysis with bootstrap resampling was used to determine the factors important for differentiation of the 2 groups and to generate models for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.

RESULTS

Several nuclear morphometric features were significantly altered and could differentiate organ- and nonorgan-confined disease. DNA ploidy was the most important factor among the significant nuclear morphometric features and was the second most important factor for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction when considered with total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), complexed PSA, free/total PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage. The combination of DNA ploidy with clinical stage, total PSA, and biopsy Gleason score showed an improvement of 1.5% in the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves compared with the combination of clinical stage, total PSA, and biopsy Gleason (73.97% vs 72.43%). The use of DNA ploidy in lieu of the biopsy Gleason score in each preoperative model evaluated resulted in equivalent or improved organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that DNA ploidy can serve as a surrogate biomarker that has the potential to replace biopsy Gleason scores for organ- vs nonorgan-confined PCa prediction.

摘要

目的

正常上皮细胞向癌细胞的转变涉及表观遗传和基因变化以及核结构和组织结构的改变。评估核形态计量学改变及临床病理特征,以预测器官局限性与非器官局限性前列腺癌(PCa)。

方法

在557例前瞻性入组患者中,370例具有所有评估参数的完整信息及足够的肿瘤面积(281例器官局限性PCa病例和89例非器官局限性PCa病例)。使用AutoCyte成像系统从活检组织中获取福尔根DNA染色细胞核的数字图像,并计算核形态计量学改变。采用带自助重抽样的逻辑回归分析来确定区分两组的重要因素,并生成器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测模型。

结果

几个核形态计量学特征有显著改变,可区分器官局限性和非器官局限性疾病。DNA倍体是显著核形态计量学特征中最重要的因素,在与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、复合PSA、游离/总PSA、活检Gleason评分及临床分期一起考虑时,是器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测的第二重要因素。与临床分期、总PSA和活检Gleason评分组合相比,DNA倍体与临床分期、总PSA和活检Gleason评分的组合在受试者操作特征曲线下面积提高了1.5%(73.97%对72.43%)。在每个评估的术前模型中,用DNA倍体代替活检Gleason评分可得到等效或更好的器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa预测结果。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,DNA倍体可作为替代生物标志物,有潜力取代活检Gleason评分用于器官局限性与非器官局限性PCa的预测。

相似文献

1
DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.060. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
3
Prediction of pathologic stage and postprostatectomy disease recurrence by DNA ploidy analysis of initial needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer.
Cancer. 1994 Nov 15;74(10):2811-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941115)74:10<2811::aid-cncr2820741012>3.0.co;2-b.
5
DNA image cytometry on biopsies can help the detection of localized Gleason 3+3 prostate cancers.
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1311-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139375.52611.0e.
10
Complexed prostate-specific antigen as a staging tool for prostate cancer: a prospective study in 420 men.
Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4 Suppl 1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01692-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance in prostate cancer biomarker discovery: bridging detection, prognosis and therapeutics.
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 30;16(1):954. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02763-1.
2
[Molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors for prostate cancer].
Urologe A. 2017 Jul;56(7):933-944. doi: 10.1007/s00120-017-0418-0.
3
Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May;13(5):291-304. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.208. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
4
Prognostic prostate tissue biomarkers of potential clinical use.
Virchows Arch. 2014 Mar;464(3):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1540-7. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
5
Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.
Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):375-84. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.148. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

3
A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.057. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Cancer statistics, 2008.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
7
Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2359-64; discussion 2364-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.039. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Combinatorial organization of the transcriptional regulatory machinery in biological control and cancer.
Adv Enzyme Regul. 2005;45:136-54. doi: 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2005.02.009. Epub 2005 Aug 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验