Luo Xuemei, Cappelleri Joseph C, Frush Karen
Center for Patient Safety and Clinical Quality, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 May;23(5):1015-24. doi: 10.1185/030079907x182211.
To conduct a systematic review of recent case-control and cohort studies in assessing adverse drug events (ADEs) among pediatric patients aged between 0 and 18 years; to establish strengths and limitations of pharmacoepidemiology when applied in evaluating pediatric drug safety; and to identify areas of pediatric drug safety that may be suitable for future pharmacoepidemiological investigations.
A PubMed search was conducted using a list of keywords representing drugs, adverse drug events, case control and cohort studies, and pediatric population. Selection criteria were used to extract relevant studies published from 1/1 2000 to 7/1 2006.
Twenty-seven studies met our criteria. Of them, 12 used a prospective cohort design. The others were either case-control (seven) or retrospective cohort (eight) studies, based on the analysis of existing databases. More than half of the studies included more than 500 subjects. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants in these studies were generally not very stringent. The subjects closely resembled patients in the real-world settings. The length of study follow-up ranged from 1 day to 40 years. In eight studies, the length of follow-up surpassed 5 years. Potential confounding factors were taken into consideration in all of the studies. But the database-based studies generally failed to control for some important clinical variables such as disease severity. Misclassification of drug exposures also occurred in some of these studies.
Despite some limitations, pharmacoepidemiology proves to be useful for assessing ADEs in pediatrics. With appropriate study design, this methodology can bolster our understanding about the safety of pediatric drug use. Several areas of pediatric drug safety may especially be suitable for future pharmacoepidemiological investigations. These areas include the safety of polypharmacy, long-term drug effects, and off-label drug use.
对近期评估0至18岁儿科患者药物不良事件(ADEs)的病例对照研究和队列研究进行系统综述;确定药物流行病学在评估儿科药物安全性时的优势和局限性;并确定可能适合未来药物流行病学调查的儿科药物安全领域。
使用代表药物、药物不良事件、病例对照和队列研究以及儿科人群的关键词列表在PubMed上进行检索。采用选择标准提取2000年1月1日至2006年7月1日发表的相关研究。
27项研究符合我们的标准。其中,12项采用前瞻性队列设计。其他研究基于现有数据库分析,分别为病例对照研究(7项)或回顾性队列研究(8项)。超过一半的研究纳入了500多名受试者。这些研究中参与者的纳入和排除标准通常不是很严格。受试者与现实环境中的患者非常相似。研究随访时间从1天到40年不等。在8项研究中,随访时间超过了5年。所有研究都考虑了潜在的混杂因素。但基于数据库的研究通常未能控制一些重要的临床变量,如疾病严重程度。在其中一些研究中也发生了药物暴露的错误分类。
尽管存在一些局限性,但药物流行病学被证明对评估儿科ADEs有用。通过适当的研究设计,这种方法可以增强我们对儿科药物使用安全性的理解。儿科药物安全的几个领域可能特别适合未来的药物流行病学调查。这些领域包括联合用药的安全性、长期药物效应和药物的非标签使用。