Linde F, Nørgaard P, Hvid I, Odgaard A, Søballe K
Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
J Biomech. 1991;24(9):803-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90305-7.
The effect of strain rate (epsilon) and apparent density (rho) on stiffness (E), strength (sigma u), and ultimate strain (epsilon u) was studied in 60 human trabecular bone specimens from the proximal tibia. Testing was performed by uniaxial compression to 5% specimen strain. Six different strain rates were used: 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 s-1. Apparent density ranged between 0.23 and 0.59 g cm-3. Linear and non-linear regression analyses using strength, stiffness and ultimate strain as dependent variables (Y) and strain rate and apparent density as independent variables were performed using the following models: Y = a rho b epsilon c, Y = rho b(a + c epsilon; Y = (a + b rho)epsilon c, Y = a rho 2 epsilon c, E = a rho 3 epsilon c. The variations of strength and stiffness were explained equally well by the linear and the power function relationship to strain rate. The exponent was 0.07 in the power function relationship between strength and strain rate and 0.05 between stiffness and strain rate. The variation of ultimate strain was explained best using a power function relationship to strain rate (exponent = 0.03). The variation of strength and stiffness was explained equally well by the linear, power function and quadratic relationship to apparent density. The cubic relationship between stiffness and apparent density showed a less good fit. Ultimate strain varied independently of apparent density.
研究了应变速率(ε)和表观密度(ρ)对60个取自胫骨近端的人松质骨标本的刚度(E)、强度(σu)和极限应变(εu)的影响。通过单轴压缩至标本应变5%来进行测试。使用了六种不同的应变速率:0.0001、0.001、0.01、0.1、1和10 s-1。表观密度范围在0.23至0.59 g cm-3之间。以强度、刚度和极限应变作为因变量(Y),应变速率和表观密度作为自变量,使用以下模型进行线性和非线性回归分析:Y = aρbεc、Y = ρb(a + cε)、Y = (a + bρ)εc、Y = aρ2εc、E = aρ3εc。强度和刚度的变化通过与应变速率的线性和幂函数关系得到了同样好的解释。强度与应变速率的幂函数关系中的指数为0.07,刚度与应变速率的幂函数关系中的指数为0.05。极限应变的变化使用与应变速率的幂函数关系(指数 = 0.03)解释得最好。强度和刚度的变化通过与表观密度的线性、幂函数和二次关系得到了同样好的解释。刚度与表观密度的三次关系拟合效果较差。极限应变的变化与表观密度无关。