Suppr超能文献

为重要生活活动使用辅助器具:患病率及其对残疾评分的影响。

Use of accommodations for valued life activities: prevalence and effects on disability scores.

作者信息

Katz Patricia P, Morris Anne

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0920, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):730-7. doi: 10.1002/art.22765.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of using 4 specific behavioral accommodations (assistive devices, personal assistance, limits on the amount or kind of activities, and taking more time to perform activities) in the performance of valued life activities (VLAs), and to examine the impact of accounting for these accommodations on VLA disability scores.

METHODS

Data were from a panel study of 467 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) interviewed annually by telephone. VLA disability was assessed using a 29-item scale, rating difficulty performing each activity and asking whether the 4 types of accommodations were used. An unadjusted difficulty score based solely on difficulty ratings was calculated, as well as 3 adjusted scores accounting for use of assistance or devices, use of assistance, devices, or limitations in activities, and use of all 4 accommodations.

RESULTS

Accommodations were widely used by individuals with RA to perform daily activities. Limits and more time were used for more activities than assistance and devices. Adjustment for accommodations produced substantial increases in disability scores (e.g., the mean total VLA difficulty score increased by 84% after adjustment for all 4 accommodations).

CONCLUSION

The accommodations included on the Health Assessment Questionnaire, the most commonly used measure of functioning for RA, include only assistive devices and personal assistance, which were not the accommodations most frequently used in our sample. If assessments are intended to estimate total disease burden, they should include use of a broader range of accommodations to develop a more complete picture of how daily function is affected.

摘要

目的

描述在进行有价值的生活活动(VLA)时使用4种特定行为辅助措施(辅助设备、个人协助、活动量或活动类型限制以及进行活动时花费更多时间)的情况,并研究考虑这些辅助措施对VLA残疾评分的影响。

方法

数据来自对467名类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者进行的一项面板研究,每年通过电话进行访谈。使用一个包含29个条目的量表评估VLA残疾情况,对进行每项活动的难度进行评分,并询问是否使用了4种类型的辅助措施。计算仅基于难度评分的未调整难度得分,以及考虑使用辅助或设备、使用辅助、设备或活动限制以及使用所有4种辅助措施的3个调整得分。

结果

RA患者广泛使用辅助措施来进行日常活动。与辅助和设备相比,限制和更多时间被用于更多活动。对辅助措施进行调整后,残疾评分大幅增加(例如,在对所有4种辅助措施进行调整后,VLA总难度评分的平均值增加了84%)。

结论

健康评估问卷中包含的辅助措施,这是RA最常用的功能测量方法,仅包括辅助设备和个人协助,而这并非我们样本中最常用的辅助措施。如果评估旨在估计疾病总负担,则应包括使用更广泛的辅助措施,以更全面地了解日常功能是如何受到影响的。

相似文献

10
The role of accommodations in poststroke disability management.辅助器具在中风后残疾管理中的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Nov;69 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S26-34. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu117.

引用本文的文献

8
Reliability and validity of the valued activity inventory for adults with cancer.癌症成年患者重要活动量表的信度与效度
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2012 Winter;32(1):238-45. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20110623-02. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Profile of arthritis disability: II.关节炎残疾概况:II。
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb 15;55(1):102-13. doi: 10.1002/art.21694.
7
Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability.残疾辅助器具的使用、类型及功效。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Nov;57(6):S366-79. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.6.s366.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验