Probst Manuel M, Fletcher Richard, Seelig Dayna S
Department of Health, Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, Kentucky 40351, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):451-5. doi: 10.1519/R-19125.1.
The purposes of this study were to compare the lower-body flexibility, strength, and knee stability of karate athletes against that of non-karate controls and to determine whether regular karate training results in adaptations that may result in an increased risk for knee injury. Flexibility measurements included knee flexion and extension, hip flexion and extension, hip internal and external rotation, and foot inversion and eversion. Nine karate athletes (4 women and 5 men, age = 24.3 +/- 6.7 years) and 15 active, non-karate controls (7 women and 8 men, age = 22.1 +/- 3.2 years) participated. No subjects reported recent knee surgery or chronic or acute knee pain. Concentric quadriceps and hamstrings strength and endurance were measured using a Biodex II isokinetic dynamometer at 60 degrees .s(-1) and 180 degrees .s(-1). Eccentric strength was measured at 150 degrees .s(-1) and 250 ft-lb (339 N.m). Knee stability was measured via varus and valgus stress and anterior drawer testing. Karate athletes demonstrated a significantly greater right hip flexion (p <or= 0.05). Isokinetic testing demonstrated a significantly greater concentric right and left hamstrings peak torque at 60 degrees .s(-1), right hamstrings to quadriceps torque ratio at both 60 degrees .s(-1) and 180 degrees .s(-1), and a significantly faster time to peak torque in the hamstrings at 60 degrees .s(-1) in the karate athletes (p <or= 0.05). Eccentric isokinetic testing showed a significantly higher peak torque at 60 degrees .s(-1) in both the right and left quadriceps and hamstrings in the karate group compared to the controls (p <or= 0.05). There were no significant differences in bilateral movement of the knees between the karate and control groups. The results indicate that this group of karate athletes may have demonstrated sport-specific adaptations in certain flexibility and strength measurements, but they showed no increased risk for knee injury.
本研究的目的是比较空手道运动员与非空手道对照组的下肢柔韧性、力量和膝关节稳定性,并确定常规空手道训练是否会导致适应性变化,从而可能增加膝关节受伤的风险。柔韧性测量包括膝关节屈伸、髋关节屈伸、髋关节内旋和外旋以及足部内翻和外翻。9名空手道运动员(4名女性和5名男性,年龄 = 24.3 ± 6.7岁)和15名活跃的非空手道对照组(7名女性和8名男性,年龄 = 22.1 ± 3.2岁)参与了研究。没有受试者报告近期有膝关节手术或慢性或急性膝关节疼痛。使用Biodex II等速测力计在60度.s(-1)和180度.s(-1)时测量股四头肌和腘绳肌的向心力量和耐力。在150度.s(-1)和250英尺磅(339牛米)时测量离心力量。通过内翻和外翻应力以及前抽屉试验测量膝关节稳定性。空手道运动员的右髋关节屈曲明显更大(p≤0.05)。等速测试表明,空手道运动员在60度.s(-1)时右、左腘绳肌的向心峰值扭矩明显更大,在60度.s(-1)和180度.s(-1)时腘绳肌与股四头肌的扭矩比明显更大,并且在60度.s(-1)时腘绳肌达到峰值扭矩的时间明显更快(p≤0.05)。离心等速测试显示,与对照组相比,空手道组右、左股四头肌和腘绳肌在60度.s(-1)时的峰值扭矩明显更高(p≤0.05)。空手道组和对照组之间膝关节的双侧运动没有显著差异。结果表明,这群空手道运动员在某些柔韧性和力量测量方面可能表现出了特定运动的适应性,但他们并未显示出膝关节受伤风险增加。