Loach Daniel, Botella Juan, Privado Jesús, Tsotsos John K
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Psychol Res. 2008 May;72(3):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0116-4. Epub 2007 May 30.
Loach and Marí-Beffa (Vis Cogn, 10:513-526, 2003) observed that a distractor stimulus, presented immediately after a behaviorally relevant target stimulus, negatively primed a related probe stimulus indicating that the distractor had been inhibited. They argued that "post-target inhibition" may be a mechanism for preventing interference from temporally proximal stimuli; interference that could potentially result in a binding/intrusion error. In order to test this hypothesis, the authors carried out two rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) experiments in which participants had to report either the identity (Experiment 1) or color (Experiment 2) of a target letter surrounded by distractor letters. In Experiment 1, a close relationship between priming and errors was observed. When a distractor stimulus showed evidence of being inhibited the participant was less likely to commit a binding error. The opposite was true when a distractor stimulus showed evidence of being facilitated. The results of Experiment 2 showed limited evidence of the same relationship.
洛赫和马里 - 贝法(《视觉认知》,第10卷:513 - 526页,2003年)观察到,在行为相关的目标刺激之后立即呈现的干扰刺激会对相关的探测刺激产生负启动效应,这表明干扰刺激已被抑制。他们认为,“目标后抑制”可能是一种防止来自时间上接近的刺激产生干扰的机制;这种干扰可能会潜在地导致绑定/侵入错误。为了验证这一假设,作者进行了两项快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)实验,在实验中参与者必须报告被干扰字母包围的目标字母的身份(实验1)或颜色(实验2)。在实验1中,观察到启动与错误之间存在密切关系。当干扰刺激显示出被抑制的迹象时,参与者犯绑定错误的可能性较小。当干扰刺激显示出被促进的迹象时,情况则相反。实验2的结果显示出相同关系的证据有限。