Buttelmann David, Call Josep, Tomasello Michael
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):117-28. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0095-2. Epub 2007 May 30.
We conducted three studies to examine whether the four great ape species (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) are able to use behavioral experimenter-given cues in an object-choice task. In the subsequent experimental conditions subjects were presented with two eggs, one of which contained food and the other did not. In Study 1 the experimenter examined both eggs by smelling or shaking them, but only made a failed attempt to open (via biting) the egg containing food. In a control condition, the experimenter examined and attempted to open both eggs, but in reverse order to control for stimulus enhancement. The apes significantly preferred the egg that was first examined and then bitten, but had no preference in a baseline condition in which there were no cues. In Study 2, we investigated whether the apes could extend this ability to cues not observed in apes so far (i.e., attempting to pull apart the egg), as well as whether they made this discrimination based on the function of the action the experimenter performed. Subjects significantly preferred eggs presented with this novel cue, but did not prefer eggs presented with a novel but functionally irrelevant action. In Study 3, apes did not interpret human actions as cues to food-location when they already knew that the eggs were empty. Thus, great apes were able to use a variety of experimenter-given cues associated with foraging actions to locate hidden food and thereby were partially sensitive to the general purpose underlying these actions.
我们进行了三项研究,以检验四种大型猿类物种(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩和红毛猩猩)在物体选择任务中是否能够利用行为实验者给出的线索。在随后的实验条件下,向受试者展示两个鸡蛋,其中一个装有食物,另一个没有。在研究1中,实验者通过闻或摇晃来检查两个鸡蛋,但只是试图打开(通过咬)装有食物的鸡蛋,但未成功。在一个对照条件下,实验者检查并试图打开两个鸡蛋,但顺序相反,以控制刺激增强。猿类显著偏好先被检查然后被咬的鸡蛋,但在没有线索的基线条件下没有偏好。在研究2中,我们调查了猿类是否能够将这种能力扩展到迄今为止在猿类中未观察到的线索(即试图拉开鸡蛋),以及它们是否基于实验者执行的动作的功能进行这种区分。受试者显著偏好呈现这种新线索的鸡蛋,但不偏好呈现新的但功能上无关动作的鸡蛋。在研究3中,当猿类已经知道鸡蛋是空的时候,它们不会将人类的动作解释为食物位置的线索。因此,大型猿类能够利用与觅食动作相关的各种实验者给出的线索来找到隐藏的食物,从而对这些动作背后的一般目的有部分敏感性。