Tileagă Cristian
School of Psychology, University of East London, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;46(Pt 4):717-37. doi: 10.1348/014466607X186894.
This paper focuses on some of the issues that arise when one treats notions such as depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization as social practices. It emphasizes the importance of: (a) understanding depersonalizing, delegitimizing and dehumanizing constructions as embedded in descriptions of located spatial activities and moral standings in the world and (b) invoking and building a socio-moral order linked to notions of lesser humanity or non-humanity, (spatial) transgression and abjection. These concerns are illustrated by taking talk on Romanies as a case in point from interviews with Romanian middle-class professionals. It is argued that a focus on description rather than explanation might be more effective in understanding the dynamics of ideologies of moral exclusion.
本文聚焦于将去人格化、去合法化和去人性化等概念视为社会实践时出现的一些问题。它强调了以下几点的重要性:(a)将去人格化、去合法化和去人性化的建构理解为嵌入在对世界中特定空间活动和道德立场的描述中;(b)援引并构建一种与较低人性或非人性、(空间)越界和厌恶感相关的社会道德秩序。通过对罗马尼亚中产阶级专业人士的访谈中以对罗姆人的讨论为例来说明这些问题。有人认为,在理解道德排斥意识形态的动态方面,关注描述而非解释可能会更有效。