• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴支持对精神疾病患者的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Pro Persona Research, Depression Expertise Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5332-5341. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002422. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291722002422
PMID:36066104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10476060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of peer support interventions (PSIs) for individuals with mental illness are not well known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PSIs for individuals with mental illness for clinical, personal, and functional recovery outcomes.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO (December 18, 2020). Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing peer-delivered PSIs to control conditions. The quality of records was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Data were pooled for each outcome, using random-effects models.

RESULTS

After screening 3455 records, 30 RCTs were included in the systematic review and 28 were meta-analyzed (4152 individuals). Compared to control conditions, peer support was associated with small but significant post-test effect sizes for , = 0.19, 95% CI (0.11-0.27), = 10%, 95% CI (0-44), and = 0.15, 95% CI (0.04-0.27), = 43%, 95% CI (1-67), but not for , = 0.08, 95% CI (-0.02 to 0.18), = 36%, 95% CI (0-61). Our findings should be considered with caution due to the modest quality of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PSIs may be effective for the clinical and personal recovery of mental illness. Effects are modest, though consistent, suggesting potential efficacy for PSI across a wide range of mental disorders and intervention types.

摘要

背景

同伴支持干预(PSIs)对精神疾病患者的益处尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估 PSIs 对精神疾病患者在临床、个人和功能恢复结果方面的有效性。

方法

在 PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO(2020 年 12 月 18 日)中进行了检索。纳入了比较同伴提供的 PSIs 与对照条件的随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具评估记录的质量。使用随机效应模型对每个结果进行汇总数据。

结果

在筛选了 3455 条记录后,30 项 RCT 被纳入系统评价,28 项进行了荟萃分析(4152 人)。与对照条件相比,同伴支持与较小但显著的后测效应量相关, = 0.19,95%CI(0.11-0.27), = 10%,95%CI(0-44), = 0.15,95%CI(0.04-0.27), = 43%,95%CI(1-67),但对 = 0.08,95%CI(-0.02-0.18), = 36%,95%CI(0-61)则不然。由于纳入研究的质量较低,我们的发现应谨慎考虑。

结论

PSIs 可能对精神疾病的临床和个人康复有效。虽然效果较小,但一致表明 PSI 对广泛的精神障碍和干预类型具有潜在疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/10476060/a607d947167c/S0033291722002422_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/10476060/284902841481/S0033291722002422_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/10476060/a607d947167c/S0033291722002422_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/10476060/284902841481/S0033291722002422_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/10476060/a607d947167c/S0033291722002422_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对精神疾病患者的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5332-5341. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002422. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
The Effectiveness of Peer Support in Personal and Clinical Recovery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.同伴支持在个人和临床康复中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):847-858. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100138. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions.系统评价和荟萃分析团体同伴支持干预对心理健康状况人群的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03321-z.
5
6
7
Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse.针对患有严重精神疾病和药物滥用问题者的社会心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 3(10):CD001088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001088.pub3.
8
Interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people with long-term physical conditions: linked evidence syntheses.改善患有长期身体状况的儿童和青少年心理健康的干预措施:综合证据的关联分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(22):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta23220.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
'I've seen you at your worst, but I still want to be your friend': A qualitative study of peer support exchange from the perspective of participants in online communities centred around self-harming and suicidal behaviour.“我见过你最糟糕的样子,但我仍想成为你的朋友”:一项从围绕自我伤害和自杀行为的在线社区参与者视角对同伴支持交流进行的定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 9;11:20552076251365075. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365075. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Navigating Challenges in Peer Support Work: Perspectives of Peer Supporters From a Stepped Care Intervention for Older Adults With Depressive Symptoms.应对同伴支持工作中的挑战:来自针对有抑郁症状老年人的逐步护理干预中同伴支持者的观点
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70430. doi: 10.1111/hex.70430.
3

本文引用的文献

1
An Update of Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients.同伴支持/同伴提供服务的更新:潜在过程、益处和关键要素。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Jun;93(2):571-586. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09971-w. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Effectiveness of eHealth-based cognitive behavioural therapy on depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于电子健康的认知行为疗法对抑郁症的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Nov;31(21-22):3021-3031. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16212. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
Using Peer Support to Strengthen Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.
Mental health in elite sports. A continuum of strategies that athletic trainers can use to support competitive athletes with psychological issues: a scoping review.精英运动中的心理健康。运动训练师可用于支持有心理问题的竞技运动员的一系列策略:一项范围综述。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1619802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1619802. eCollection 2025.
4
The "Paths to everyday life" peer support intervention for adults with mental health difficulties versus service as usual in a Danish community setting - results from a randomized two-armed, multi-site, superiority trial.针对有心理健康问题的成年人的“融入日常生活”同伴支持干预与丹麦社区环境中的常规服务比较——一项随机双臂、多地点、优效性试验的结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07011-y.
5
"What Do We Do Now?": Recommendations to Combat Professionals' Public Stigma Against Women Who Experience Intimate Partner Violence.《“我们现在该怎么做?”:应对专业人员对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的公众污名化的建议》
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jun;54(6):2303-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03156-9. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
6
Effectiveness of Youth and Young Adult Peer Support in Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.青少年和青年同伴支持在心理健康服务中的有效性:一项系统综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01451-0.
7
Editorial: Mental health recovery: engaging and empowering people living with mental illness and their families.社论:心理健康康复:让精神疾病患者及其家人参与其中并赋予他们力量。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 6;16:1633178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1633178. eCollection 2025.
8
Peer Support Intervention for Suicide Prevention Among High-Risk Adults in Michigan: A Randomized Clinical Trial.密歇根州高危成年人自杀预防同伴支持干预:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510808. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10808.
9
A Structured Peer Support Intervention for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Peer Support Interventionists' Perspectives.一项针对接受造血干细胞移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的结构化同伴支持干预:同伴支持干预者的观点。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.03.017.
10
Loneliness, Self-Efficacy and Adaptive Coping: Mixed Methods Analysis of Mediation in a Peer Support Intervention for Depression.孤独感、自我效能感与适应性应对:针对抑郁症的同伴支持干预中介作用的混合方法分析
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;33(7):770-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2025.02.013. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
利用同伴支持在 COVID-19 大流行期间加强心理健康:一项综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 12;12:714181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714181. eCollection 2021.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions.系统评价和荟萃分析团体同伴支持干预对心理健康状况人群的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03321-z.
5
The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一对一同伴支持在精神卫生服务中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3.
6
Effectiveness of peer support intervention on perinatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持干预对围产期抑郁的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 大流行期间普通人群中的压力、焦虑和抑郁患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w.
8
Digital Peer Support Mental Health Interventions for People With a Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness: Systematic Review.针对有严重精神疾病亲身经历者的数字同伴支持心理健康干预措施:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 3;7(4):e16460. doi: 10.2196/16460.
9
Peer mentorship as an adjunct intervention for the treatment of eating disorders: A pilot randomized trial.同伴指导作为一种辅助干预手段用于治疗进食障碍:一项初步随机试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 May;53(5):497-509. doi: 10.1002/eat.23258. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.如何使用 R 进行荟萃分析:实用教程。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. Epub 2019 Sep 28.