Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Shafik I A
Department of Surgery and Experimental Research, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2000 Winter;23(4):270-5. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2000.11753536.
Although advances in rehabilitation practices, pharmacology, and surgery offer new bowel program alternatives, digital-rectal stimulation is still utilized to facilitate defecation in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We speculated that defecation induced by such a technique is mediated through a reflex mechanism.
The study comprised 18 healthy volunteers (10 men, 8 women, mean age 36.6 +/- 9.7 years) and 9 patients with SCI (6 men, 3 women, mean age 35.1 +/- 11.2 years). The anal canal was dilated by a balloon inflated in 2-mL increments to 10 mL, and rectal pressure response was then recorded. The test was repeated after separate block of the external and internal anal sphincters and after individual anesthetization of the anal canal and rectum.
In normal subjects, the rectal pressure rose significantly (p < 0.01) with 2-mL inflation. Increases in anal dilatation effected further rectal pressure elevations (p < 0.001), although there were no significant differences among the 4-, 6-, and 10-mL distensions (p > 0.05). The rectal pressure rise occurred with external, but not with internal, sphincter paralysis. In the subjects with paraplegia, there was no rectal pressure response to the 2- and 4-mL anal dilatations, while the 6-, 8-, and 10-mL distensions effected significant pressure increases (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) that did not differ significantly among the 3 distending volumes. Internal sphincter inhibition, in contrast to the external sphincter, produced no rectal pressure response. In both normal subjects and subjects with paraplegia, the rectal pressure response did not occur after individual anesthetization of the rectum and anal canal.
Anal dilatation induces rectal contraction through stimulation of mechanoreceptors, possibly in the internal sphincter. Rectal contraction upon anal dilatation suggests a reflex relationship that was absent on individual anesthetization of the possible 2 arms of the reflex arc: anal canal and rectum. This relationship, which we term the "anorectal excitatory reflex," appears to be evoked on digital anal dilatation. The reflex might be of diagnostic significance in defecation disorders and has the potential to be used as an investigative tool.
尽管康复治疗、药理学及外科手术方面的进展提供了新的肠道功能训练方案,但直肠指诊刺激仍被用于促进脊髓损伤(SCI)患者排便。我们推测,这种技术诱导的排便通过反射机制介导。
本研究纳入了18名健康志愿者(10名男性,8名女性,平均年龄36.6±9.7岁)和9名脊髓损伤患者(6名男性,3名女性,平均年龄35.1±11.2岁)。通过以2毫升递增的方式向球囊内充气至10毫升来扩张肛管,然后记录直肠压力反应。在分别阻断肛门外括约肌和内括约肌以及分别麻醉肛管和直肠后重复该试验。
在正常受试者中,充气2毫升时直肠压力显著升高(p<0.01)。肛管扩张进一步导致直肠压力升高(p<0.001),尽管4毫升、6毫升和10毫升扩张之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。直肠压力升高发生在肛门外括约肌麻痹时,而内括约肌麻痹时未出现。在截瘫受试者中,2毫升和4毫升肛管扩张时直肠无压力反应,而6毫升、8毫升和10毫升扩张时压力显著升高(分别为p<0.001、p<0.001、p<0.001),这3个扩张容积之间无显著差异。与肛门外括约肌不同,内括约肌抑制未产生直肠压力反应。在正常受试者和截瘫受试者中,分别麻醉直肠和肛管后均未出现直肠压力反应。
肛管扩张通过刺激机械感受器诱导直肠收缩,可能是在内括约肌。肛管扩张时直肠收缩提示存在一种反射关系,而当反射弧的两个可能部分(肛管和直肠)分别麻醉时这种关系不存在。我们将这种关系称为“肛门直肠兴奋性反射”,似乎在手指扩张肛管时被诱发。该反射可能对排便障碍具有诊断意义,并有潜力用作一种研究工具。