Lammers Ann C
J Anal Psychol. 2007 Jun;52(3):253-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00662.x.
This paper discusses theoretical, historical and personal issues in the ill-fated friendship and intellectual collaboration between C.G. Jung and the Dominican scholar Victor White, O.P., based on primary documents in their correspondence, 1945 to 1960. The collaboration of Jung and White began with high expectations but fell into painful disagreements about the nature of God, the problem of evil, and shadow aspects of the Self. They made a rapid commitment to their working alliance based on personal and professional hopes, but paying scant attention to their divergent underlying assumptions. White hoped to build theoretical and practical connections between Jungian psychology and Catholic theology for the sake of modern Catholics. Jung needed learned theological support as he explored the psychological meanings of Christian symbols, including the central symbol of Christ. At the grandest level, they both hoped to transform the Christian West, after the moral disaster of World War II. Their collaboration was risky for both men, especially for White in his career as a Dominican, and it led to considerable suffering. The Self is prominent in the relationship, symbolically present in the text of the correspondence and consciously forming their major topic of debate. From the start, the Self is an archetypal field, drawing the friends into their visionary task at the risk of unconscious inflation. Later the Self is revealed with its shadow as a burden, a puzzle, and a basis for estrangement. Finally, with the intervention of feminine wisdom, mortal suffering is transformed by an attitude of conscious sacrifice.
本文基于1945年至1960年间卡尔·古斯塔夫·荣格(C.G. Jung)与多米尼克学者维克托·怀特(Victor White, O.P.)之间往来信件的原始文件,探讨了这段不幸的友谊以及他们在学术合作中所涉及的理论、历史和个人问题。荣格与怀特的合作起初满怀期待,但后来在上帝的本质、恶的问题以及自我的阴影方面陷入了痛苦的分歧。他们基于个人和职业期望迅速建立了工作联盟,却很少关注彼此不同的潜在假设。怀特希望为现代天主教徒在荣格心理学与天主教神学之间建立理论和实践联系。荣格在探索包括基督核心象征在内的基督教符号的心理意义时,需要有学识的神学支持。在最宏大的层面上,他们都希望在二战的道德灾难之后改变西方基督教世界。他们的合作对两人来说都有风险,对身为多米尼克会士的怀特而言尤其如此,并且导致了相当多的痛苦。自我在这段关系中十分突出,象征性地呈现在往来信件的文本中,并自觉地成为他们主要的争论话题。从一开始,自我就是一个原型领域,将朋友们卷入他们的幻想任务,冒着无意识膨胀的风险。后来,自我及其阴影被揭示为一种负担、一个谜题以及疏远的根源。最后,在女性智慧的干预下,通过有意识的牺牲态度,凡人的痛苦得以转化。