Schaaf B, Kruse J, Rupp J, Reinert R R, Droemann D, Zabel P, Ewig S, Dalhoff K
Medical Clinic III, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2007 Sep;30(3):517-24. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00021007. Epub 2007 May 30.
Easily performed prognostic rules are helpful for guiding the intensity of monitoring and treatment of patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive value of the sepsis score and the Confusion, Respiratory rate (> or =30 breaths.min(-1)), Blood pressure (systolic value <90 mmHg or diastolic value < or =60 mmHg) and age > or =65 yrs (CRB-65) score in 105 patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. In addition, the influence of timing of the antimicrobial treatment on outcome was investigated. The sepsis and the CRB-65 scores were used to allocate patients to subgroups with low, intermediate and high risk. Comparable, highly predictive values for mortality were found for both scores (sepsis score versus CRB-65): 1) low-risk group, 0 versus 0%; 2) intermediate-risk group, 0 versus 8.6%; 3) high-risk group, 30.6 versus 40%, with an area under the curve of 0.867 versus 0.845. Patients with ambulatory antibiotic pre-treatment had less severe disease with a lower acute physiology score, lower white blood cell count and a faster decline of C-reactive protein levels. No pre-treated patient died. In summary, both scores performed equally well in predicting mortality. The prediction of survival in the intermediate-risk group might be more accurate with the sepsis score. Pre-hospital antibiotic treatment was associated with less severe disease.
易于实施的预后规则有助于指导患者的监测和治疗强度。本研究的目的是比较脓毒症评分与意识模糊、呼吸频率(≥30次/分钟)、血压(收缩压<90 mmHg或舒张压≤60 mmHg)及年龄≥65岁(CRB-65)评分对105例社区获得性肺炎球菌肺炎患者的预测价值。此外,还研究了抗菌治疗时机对预后的影响。脓毒症评分和CRB-65评分用于将患者分为低、中、高风险亚组。两种评分对死亡率的预测价值相当且较高:1)低风险组,分别为0%对0%;2)中风险组,分别为0%对8.6%;3)高风险组,分别为30.6%对40%,曲线下面积分别为0.867对0.845。门诊抗生素预处理的患者病情较轻,急性生理学评分较低,白细胞计数较低,C反应蛋白水平下降更快。无预处理患者死亡。总之,两种评分在预测死亡率方面表现相当。脓毒症评分对中风险组生存的预测可能更准确。院前抗生素治疗与病情较轻相关。