Carvalho Maria da Gloria S, Tondella Maria Lucia, McCaustland Karen, Weidlich Luciana, McGee Lesley, Mayer Leonard W, Steigerwalt Arnold, Whaley Melissa, Facklam Richard R, Fields Barry, Carlone George, Ades Edwin W, Dagan Ron, Sampson Jacquelyn S
Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2460-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02498-06. Epub 2007 May 30.
The accurate diagnosis of pneumococcal disease has frequently been hampered not only by the difficulties in obtaining isolates of the organism from patient specimens but also by the misidentification of pneumococcus-like viridans group streptococci (P-LVS) as Streptococcus pneumoniae. This is especially critical when the specimen comes from the respiratory tract. In this study, three novel real-time PCR assays designed for the detection of specific sequence regions of the lytA, ply, and psaA genes were developed (lytA-CDC, ply-CDC, and psaA, respectively). These assays showed high sensitivity (<10 copies for lytA-CDC and ply-CDC and an approximately twofold less sensitivity for psaA). Two additional real-time PCR assays for lytA and ply described previously for pneumococcal DNA detection were also evaluated. A panel of isolates consisting of 67 S. pneumoniae isolates (44 different serotypes and 3 nonencapsulated S. pneumoniae isolates from conjunctivitis outbreaks) and 104 nonpneumococcal isolates was used. The 67 S. pneumoniae isolates were reactive in all five assays. The new real-time detection assays targeting the lytA and psaA genes were the most specific for the detection of isolates confirmed to be S. pneumoniae, with lytA-CDC showing the greatest specificity. Both ply PCRs were positive for all isolates of S. pseudopneumoniae, along with 13 other isolates of other P-LVS isolates confirmed to be non-S. pneumoniae by DNA-DNA reassociation. Thus, the use of the ply gene for the detection of pneumococci can lead to false-positive reactions in the presence of P-LVS. The five assays were applied to 15 culture-positive cerebrospinal fluid specimens with 100% sensitivity; and serum and ear fluid specimens were also evaluated. Both the lytA-CDC and psaA assays, particularly the lytA-CDC assay, have improved specificities compared with those of currently available assays and should therefore be considered the assays of choice for the detection of pneumococcal DNA, particularly when upper respiratory P-LVS might be present in the clinical specimen.
肺炎球菌疾病的准确诊断常常受到阻碍,这不仅是因为从患者标本中获取该病原体的分离株存在困难,还因为类肺炎链球菌(P-LVS)这种类似肺炎球菌的草绿色链球菌常被误鉴定为肺炎链球菌。当标本来自呼吸道时,这一点尤为关键。在本研究中,开发了三种用于检测lytA、ply和psaA基因特定序列区域的新型实时荧光定量PCR检测方法(分别为lytA-CDC、ply-CDC和psaA)。这些检测方法显示出高灵敏度(lytA-CDC和ply-CDC小于10个拷贝,psaA的灵敏度约低两倍)。还评估了先前描述的另外两种用于肺炎球菌DNA检测的lytA和ply实时荧光定量PCR检测方法。使用了一组分离株,包括67株肺炎链球菌分离株(44种不同血清型以及3株来自结膜炎暴发的非包膜肺炎链球菌分离株)和104株非肺炎球菌分离株。67株肺炎链球菌分离株在所有五种检测方法中均呈阳性反应。针对lytA和psaA基因设计的新型实时检测方法在检测经确认的肺炎链球菌分离株方面具有最高的特异性,其中lytA-CDC显示出最大的特异性。两种ply PCR检测方法对所有伪肺炎链球菌分离株均呈阳性,另外13株其他P-LVS分离株经DNA-DNA重结合确认不是肺炎链球菌,这两种检测方法对它们也呈阳性。因此,如果存在P-LVS,则使用ply基因检测肺炎球菌会导致假阳性反应。这五种检测方法应用于15份培养阳性的脑脊液标本,灵敏度为100%;还对血清和耳液标本进行了评估。与现有检测方法相比.lytA-CDC和psaA检测方法,特别是lytA-CDC检测方法,具有更高的特异性,因此应被视为检测肺炎球菌DNA的首选检测方法,尤其是当临床标本中可能存在上呼吸道P-LVS时。