• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)TG-21协议对高达26 MV的加速电位进行光子吸收剂量测量的结果。

Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.

作者信息

Hazle J D, Kirby T H, Gastorf R J, Hanson W F

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(6):1234-6. doi: 10.1118/1.596596.

DOI:10.1118/1.596596
PMID:1753909
Abstract

The AAPM Task Group 21 protocol for the calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams was produced to accomplish essentially two goals: (1) incorporate the latest physical data available for calculating absorbed dose from ionization measurements and (2) to eliminate inconsistencies in absorbed dose measurements made with various ion chamber and phantom combinations. The ability of the protocol was assessed to consistently determine x-ray absorbed dose from measurements made with four Farmer-type chambers and one parallel-plate chamber in water, polystyrene, and acrylic phantoms. The measurements were performed using seven high-energy x-ray beams from 60Co to 26-MV nominal accelerating potential. The absorbed dose to water calculated from measurements made with the various chamber and phantom combinations were found to be consistent. The doses calculated for the two most common phantom materials, water and polystyrene, were found to be in excellent agreement. This resolved a 1.6% discrepancy in the absorbed dose determined from the two phantoms using the SCRAD protocol. The doses for acrylic phantoms were found to be approximately 1.2%, low for nominal accelerating potentials less than 8.8 MV. For accelerating potentials of 8.8 MV or greater the agreement was considerably better. The mean dose determined for the parallel-plate chamber from measurements in polystyrene was found to be within 0.7% of the mean dose determined using Farmer-type ion chambers in all phantom materials.

摘要

美国医学物理师协会第21任务组制定的高能光子和电子束校准协议主要有两个目标:(1)纳入用于根据电离测量计算吸收剂量的最新物理数据;(2)消除使用各种电离室和模体组合进行吸收剂量测量时的不一致性。评估了该协议能否根据在水、聚苯乙烯和丙烯酸模体中使用四个 Farmer 型电离室和一个平行板电离室进行的测量,一致地确定X射线吸收剂量。测量使用了七束从60Co到标称加速电位为26MV的高能X射线束。发现由各种电离室和模体组合测量得到的水的吸收剂量是一致的。发现为两种最常用的模体材料水和聚苯乙烯计算的剂量非常吻合。这解决了使用SCRAD协议从两种模体确定的吸收剂量中1.6%的差异。发现丙烯酸模体的剂量在标称加速电位小于8.8MV时约低1.2%。对于8.8MV或更高的加速电位,吻合度要好得多。发现在所有模体材料中,平行板电离室在聚苯乙烯中测量确定的平均剂量在使用Farmer型电离室确定的平均剂量的0.7%以内。

相似文献

1
Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.使用美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)TG-21协议对高达26 MV的加速电位进行光子吸收剂量测量的结果。
Med Phys. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(6):1234-6. doi: 10.1118/1.596596.
2
Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.计算得出的吸收剂量比,即TG51/TG21,适用于一系列光子和电子能量范围内最常用的圆柱形和平行板电离室。
Med Phys. 2002 Jul;29(7):1464-72. doi: 10.1118/1.1487857.
3
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能光子束中的参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Jan;28(1):46-54. doi: 10.1118/1.1333745.
4
A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.美国医学物理学家协会“高能光子和电子束吸收剂量测定协议”与当前使用协议的比较。
Med Phys. 1984 Nov-Dec;11(6):806-13. doi: 10.1118/1.595568.
5
Absorbed dose comparison among commercial ionization chambers in polystyrene and acrylic phantoms.聚苯乙烯和丙烯酸体模中商用电离室的吸收剂量比较。
Med Phys. 1988 Mar-Apr;15(2):269-72. doi: 10.1118/1.596269.
6
The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1996 Sep;19(3):197-200.
7
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能电子束参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Oct;28(10):2077-87. doi: 10.1118/1.1405841.
8
Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.不同剂量测定方案下高能光子与电子剂量测定的比较。
Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):857-68. doi: 10.1118/1.1470208.
9
Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.国际原子能机构1987年与美国医学物理学家协会1983年放射治疗束剂量校准协议的比较。
Med Phys. 1991 Jan-Feb;18(1):26-35. doi: 10.1118/1.596720.
10
Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.模体材料和尺寸对电离室在水吸收剂量校准方面影响的研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Aug 24;7(3):55-64. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2264.