BACKGROUND

Rates for laparoscopic fundoplication are declining in the United States and there is no consensus on the indications for referral to surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To highlight recent studies on the outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication in adults that cast doubt on the traditional indications for surgery in reflux disease.

RESULTS

Patients who are well maintained on medical therapy have more to lose with surgical intervention than to gain, and should not be offered surgery. Likewise, the notion that surgery prevents oesophageal cancer is a hypothesis that is not supported by current evidence, therefore surgical intervention should not be offered to these patients. The only clear-cut candidates for surgery include: patients with anatomic abnormalities such as a large hiatus hernia, or those with persistent regurgitation that causes troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy; and carefully selected patients with extra-oesophageal disorders who have symptoms of reflux disease such as heartburn and regurgitation, an incomplete response to medical therapy and persistent plus demonstrable reflux on pH or impedance testing that is associated with their symptoms. Patients should be aware of the high likelihood of needing continued acid inhibitory therapy following surgery and the possibility of side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Only a few carefully selected patients should undergo fundoplication for reflux disease.