Suppr超能文献

促进步行的干预措施:系统评价

Interventions to promote walking: systematic review.

作者信息

Ogilvie David, Foster Charles E, Rothnie Helen, Cavill Nick, Hamilton Val, Fitzsimons Claire F, Mutrie Nanette

机构信息

Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ.

出版信息

BMJ. 2007 Jun 9;334(7605):1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE. Epub 2007 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic search for and appraisal of controlled before and after studies of the effects of any type of intervention on how much people walk, the distribution of effects on walking between social groups, and any associated effects on overall physical activity, fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing.

RESULTS

We included 19 randomised controlled trials and 29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventions tailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentary or at those most motivated to change, and delivered either at the level of the individual (brief advice, supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) or household (individualised marketing) or through groups, can encourage people to walk more, although the sustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits of many of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends on isolated studies or subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of the most sedentary.

摘要

目的

评估促进个体和人群步行的干预措施的效果。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

通过检索25个电子数据库、搜索网站、参考文献列表及现有系统评价,并联系专家,识别出的任何语言的已发表和未发表报告。

综述方法

系统检索和评估各类干预措施对人们步行量影响的前后对照研究、不同社会群体间步行效果的分布情况,以及对总体身体活动、健康状况、疾病风险因素、健康和幸福感的任何相关影响。

结果

我们纳入了19项随机对照试验和29项非随机对照研究。根据人们需求量身定制、针对久坐不动人群或最有改变意愿人群、在个体层面(简短建议、支持使用计步器、电信手段)、家庭层面(个性化营销)或通过群体实施的干预措施,可鼓励人们增加步行量,尽管其中许多方法的可持续性、普遍性和临床益处尚不确定。应用于工作场所、学校、社区或特定区域的干预措施有效性的证据通常依赖于孤立的研究或亚组分析。

结论

最成功的干预措施平均每周可使目标参与者的步行量增加30 - 60分钟,至少在短期内如此。从改善人群健康的角度来看,目前许多研究提供的是疗效证据而非效果证据。然而,促进步行的干预措施可极大地有助于提高久坐不动人群的活动水平。

相似文献

1
Interventions to promote walking: systematic review.促进步行的干预措施:系统评价
BMJ. 2007 Jun 9;334(7605):1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE. Epub 2007 May 31.
3
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4.
5
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.简短酒精干预措施在初级保健人群中的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2(2):CD004148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4.
8
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.体力活动治疗肠易激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Interventions for promoting physical activity.促进身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD003180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003180.pub2.
8
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.评估非随机干预研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. doi: 10.3310/hta7270.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验