• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症临床试验中的药物成本和自付费用。

Drug costs and out-of-pocket spending in cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Kilgore Meredith L, Goldman Dana P

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, 1665 University Blvd. RPHB 330, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2007.04.004
PMID:17544339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of clinical trial participation on drug utilization, drug costs, and out-of-pocket expenditures for cancer patients.

METHODS

The study used a national probability sample of patients participating in cancer clinical trials and a matched cohort of patients not enrolled in trials but receiving treatment for the same cancers from the same providers. Subjects were interviewed about prescription drug utilization and out-of-pocket drug expenditures. We estimated treatment costs based on a large pharmacy transaction database. Multivariate regression was used to estimate the effects of trial participation on drug costs and out-of-pocket expenditures.

RESULTS

Participants in clinical trials incurred higher prescription drug costs than non-participants: an average of $131 over a six-month period. However, there was no significant difference in out-of-pocket expenditures for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in clinical trials was associated with a modest increase in prescription drug utilization and costs, but these costs did not necessarily impose an economic burden on cancer trial participants.

摘要

目的

评估参与临床试验对癌症患者药物使用、药物成本和自付费用的影响。

方法

本研究采用了参与癌症临床试验患者的全国概率样本,以及未参加试验但接受来自相同医疗服务提供者的相同癌症治疗的匹配队列患者。就处方药使用情况和自付药物费用对受试者进行了访谈。我们基于一个大型药房交易数据库估算了治疗成本。采用多元回归分析来评估参与试验对药物成本和自付费用的影响。

结果

临床试验参与者的处方药成本高于非参与者:在六个月期间平均高出131美元。然而,两组的自付费用没有显著差异。

结论

参与临床试验与处方药使用和成本的适度增加相关,但这些成本不一定会给癌症试验参与者带来经济负担。

相似文献

1
Drug costs and out-of-pocket spending in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中的药物成本和自付费用。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 6.
2
Characteristics of patients receiving pharmaceutical samples and association between sample receipt and out-of-pocket prescription costs.接受药品样品的患者特征以及样品接收与自付处方费用之间的关联。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):394-402. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181618ee0.
3
The Medicare Part D doughnut hole: effect on pharmacy utilization.医疗保险D部分的药品福利缺口:对药房利用的影响。
Manag Care Interface. 2007 Sep;20(9):51-5, 59.
4
Out-of-pocket expenditures of outpatients receiving chemotherapy.接受化疗的门诊患者的自付费用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Oct;25(9):1615-22.
5
Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population.参保人群中酒渣鼻患者的医疗服务利用情况及费用
J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Jan;7(1):41-9.
6
Health care expenditures of living with a disability: total expenditures, out-of-pocket expenses, and burden, 1996 to 2004.残疾生活的医疗保健支出:1996年至2004年的总支出、自付费用及负担
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1532-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.020.
7
Physicians' perceptions of relevant prescription drug costs: do costs to the individual patient or to the population matter most?医生对相关处方药成本的看法:对个体患者的成本还是对总体人群的成本最为重要?
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Sep;12(9):545-51.
8
Trends in out-of-pocket healthcare costs among older community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries.老年社区医保受益人的自付医疗费用趋势。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Oct;14(10):692-6.
9
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
10
Analysis of national annual variation in total patient out-of-pocket Medicare Part D stand-alone prescription drug plan costs from 2007 to 2008.2007年至2008年全国医疗保险D部分独立处方药计划患者自付费用年度变化分析。
J Med Econ. 2008;11(4):625-37. doi: 10.3111/13696990802581079.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve access to clinical trials in urologic oncology.改善泌尿生殖系统肿瘤临床试验可及性的干预措施。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Mar;17(3):E67-E74. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8011.
2
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.人工智能在数字病理学中的应用——诊断和精准肿瘤学的新工具。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov;16(11):703-715. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Science in the Heartland: Exploring determinants of offering cancer clinical trials in rural-serving community urology practices.
美国心脏地带的科学:探索农村社区泌尿科实践中提供癌症临床试验的决定因素。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Aug;37(8):529.e9-529.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
Financial Hardships Experienced by Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.癌症幸存者所经历的经济困难:一项系统综述
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 20;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw205. Print 2017 Feb.
5
Gender differences in cost-related medication non-adherence among cancer survivors.癌症幸存者中与费用相关的药物治疗不依从性的性别差异。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Apr;10(2):384-93. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0484-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation.患者收入水平与癌症临床试验参与度。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):536-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.4553. Epub 2013 Jan 7.