Suppr超能文献

针对痴呆症患者家庭成员中的男性照料者的两种基于距离的干预措施的比较结果。

Comparative outcomes of two distance-based interventions for male caregivers of family members with dementia.

作者信息

Gant Judith R, Steffen Ann M, Lauderdale Sean A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, MO 63121-4400, USA.

出版信息

Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2007 Apr-May;22(2):120-8. doi: 10.1177/1533317506298880.

Abstract

Data are presented on a preliminary study investigating the efficacy of 2 distance-based psychosocial interventions (N = 32) for male family dementia caregivers. Male caregivers were randomly assigned to either a basic education intervention (ie, educational booklet and biweekly check-in telephone calls) or a video intervention (ie, set of 10 videos, an accompanying workbook, and weekly telephone coaching sessions using behavioral strategies to manage challenging caregiving situations). Results did not support the greater efficacy of the video condition in reducing psychosocial distress (eg, negative affect, upset and annoyance following behavior problems) or increasing positive affect or caregiving self-efficacy. There was, however, a statistically significant effect for postintervention improvement in both the video/coaching and the educational booklet/check-in conditions. Potential reasons for the lack of differential treatment effects are discussed, along with implications for recruitment of male dementia caregivers.

摘要

本文呈现了一项初步研究的数据,该研究调查了两种基于远程的心理社会干预措施(N = 32)对男性家庭痴呆症照料者的疗效。男性照料者被随机分配到基础教育干预组(即教育手册和每两周一次的电话随访)或视频干预组(即一套10个视频、一本配套工作手册以及使用行为策略来应对具有挑战性的照料情况的每周电话辅导课程)。结果并不支持视频干预组在减轻心理社会困扰(如负面情绪、行为问题后的心烦和恼怒)或增加积极情绪或照料自我效能方面具有更高的疗效。然而,在视频/辅导组和教育手册/随访组中,干预后均有统计学上显著的改善效果。文中讨论了缺乏差异治疗效果的潜在原因,以及对招募男性痴呆症照料者的启示。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验