Suppr超能文献

社区中痴呆症患者非正式照顾者的电子健康和基于网络的干预措施:伞式综述。

eHealth and Web-Based Interventions for Informal Carers of People With Dementia in the Community: Umbrella Review.

机构信息

School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 22;24(7):e36727. doi: 10.2196/36727.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of dementia is increasing, and there are many associated problems that family members face as informal carers, including emotional, physical, and financial difficulties. There are benefits for a person with dementia to live at home for as long as possible, and therefore, supporting their informal carers is crucial. The growing interest in supporting carers through internet-based interventions is evidenced by the volume of systematic reviews on this topic. It is now appropriate to systematically examine this body of work and provide an overview of the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This umbrella review aimed to identify the most effective internet-based intervention content and delivery method to support those caring for someone with dementia living in the community.

METHODS

PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched for systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of web-based interventions for informal carers of people with dementia. A total of 3 reviewers extracted data and evaluated the quality of the papers. To ascertain the extent to which the systematic reviews reported on the same evidence, the proportion of overlap between their included studies was calculated. Qualitative research findings were extracted and reported.

RESULTS

A total of 21 papers were included in the study. The quality of the review papers was mainly rated as low to moderate, and 10% (2/21) of papers were of high quality. The findings suggest that multicomponent interventions were the most effective in supporting carers. These included combinations of cognitive behavioral therapy and relaxation strategies, educational resources, and online support groups. Interventions that were delivered on the web but included sessions with a personal element, such as telephone contact, showed the best results. When comparing the studies reviewed in all the review papers, a moderate overlap was noted. However, when comparing individual reviews with each other, they showed a high overlap of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed delivery methods and intervention content showed the most effective results in supporting those caring for people with dementia. However, many papers do not separate the results for differing intervention contents or delivery; this needs to be considered when drawing conclusions. There was an overlap among the studies included in the reviews. This suggests a lack of current research on the effectiveness of web-based interventions for people caring for a person with dementia. There was also a lack of consistency in the outcome measures across all papers. Future studies can involve updating research on the effectiveness of these interventions while distinguishing between different intervention types, thus creating guidelines for the use of standardized measures to enable comparisons of intervention effects and improve the scientific quality of the overall research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021241559; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=241559.

摘要

背景

痴呆症的患病率正在上升,家庭成员作为非正式照顾者面临着许多相关问题,包括情绪、身体和经济困难。让痴呆症患者尽可能长时间地在家中生活是有益的,因此,支持他们的非正式照顾者至关重要。通过基于互联网的干预措施来支持照顾者的兴趣日益浓厚,这一点在关于这个主题的系统评价数量上得到了证明。现在适当地对这部分工作进行系统检查,并提供文献综述。

目的

本伞式综述旨在确定最有效的基于互联网的干预内容和传递方法,以支持那些在社区中照顾痴呆症患者的人。

方法

在 PsycINFO、Web of Science、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 PubMed 中搜索了评估基于网络的干预措施对痴呆症患者的非正式照顾者的有效性的系统评价。共有 3 名审查员提取数据并评估了论文的质量。为了确定系统评价报告的相同证据的程度,计算了其纳入研究之间重叠的比例。提取并报告了定性研究结果。

结果

共有 21 篇论文纳入研究。综述论文的质量主要被评为低至中度,10%(2/21)的论文质量较高。研究结果表明,多组分干预措施在支持照顾者方面最为有效。这些干预措施包括认知行为疗法和放松策略、教育资源和在线支持小组的组合。在网络上提供但包含个人元素的干预措施,如电话联系,效果最好。当比较所有综述论文中的研究时,注意到中度重叠。但是,当相互比较个别综述时,它们显示出纳入研究的高度重叠。

结论

混合传递方法和干预内容在支持照顾痴呆症患者方面显示出最有效的结果。然而,许多论文并没有将结果分开来考虑不同的干预内容或传递方式;在得出结论时需要考虑到这一点。综述中纳入的研究之间存在重叠。这表明在为照顾痴呆症患者的人提供基于网络的干预措施的有效性方面,当前研究不足。所有论文中的结果测量也缺乏一致性。未来的研究可以涉及更新这些干预措施有效性的研究,同时区分不同的干预类型,从而为使用标准化措施提供指导,以实现干预效果的比较并提高整体研究的科学质量。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42021241559;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=241559。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e9/9356334/e2ac6ae1518a/jmir_v24i7e36727_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验