• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绒毛取样后自然流产的临床和病理因素

Clinical and pathological factors in spontaneous abortion following chorionic villus sampling.

作者信息

McCormack M J, Mackenzie W E, Rushton D I, Newton J R

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Maternity Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 1991 Nov;11(11):841-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970111105.

DOI:10.1002/pd.1970111105
PMID:1754555
Abstract

Twenty-nine cases of spontaneous abortion following first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (CVS) were reviewed out of a series of 722 patients. Of the 29 cases, there were only four abnormal CVS results. Pathological examination was performed in 79 per cent of cases, and this did not identify any characteristic pathological feature associated with spontaneous abortion after CVS. There was no obvious difference in the pathological features following the transabdominal (TA) or the transcervical (TC) methods. The majority of miscarriages occurred within 4 weeks of the procedure, but 38 per cent of cases aborted between 7 and 14 weeks after CVS. The TC method was used in 22 patients; the TA in 6; and both methods in 1 patient. The TA method was associated with a significantly lower fetal loss rate than the TC method (TA 2 per cent, TC 9 per cent, p less than 0.001).

摘要

在722例患者中,对29例孕早期绒毛取样(CVS)后自然流产的病例进行了回顾。在这29例病例中,只有4例CVS结果异常。79%的病例进行了病理检查,但未发现与CVS后自然流产相关的任何特征性病理特征。经腹(TA)或经宫颈(TC)方法后的病理特征无明显差异。大多数流产发生在手术后4周内,但38%的病例在CVS后7至14周流产。22例患者采用TC方法;6例采用TA方法;1例同时采用两种方法。TA方法的胎儿丢失率明显低于TC方法(TA为2%,TC为9%,p<0.001)。

相似文献

1
Clinical and pathological factors in spontaneous abortion following chorionic villus sampling.绒毛取样后自然流产的临床和病理因素
Prenat Diagn. 1991 Nov;11(11):841-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970111105.
2
Decreasing risk of pregnancy loss following chorionic villus sampling. Elimination of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling during the ninth week of pregnancy.绒毛取样后降低流产风险。在妊娠第九周取消经腹绒毛取样。
J Reprod Med. 1992 Oct;37(10):853-6.
3
[Comparison between transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling in clinical application for prenatal diagnosis].经腹与经宫颈绒毛取样在产前诊断临床应用中的比较
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Nov;43(11):814-7.
4
Spontaneous abortion rate and advanced maternal age: consequences for prenatal diagnosis.自然流产率与高龄孕产妇:对产前诊断的影响
Lancet. 1990 Jul 7;336(8706):27-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91528-i.
5
Transcervical (TC) and transabdominal (TA) CVS for prenatal diagnosis in Rotterdam: experience with 3611 cases.荷兰鹿特丹经宫颈(TC)和经腹(TA)绒毛取样术用于产前诊断:3611例经验
Prenat Diagn. 1991 Aug;11(8):559-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970110811.
6
Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study.绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术后的总妊娠丢失:一项队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):599-606. doi: 10.1002/uog.15986.
7
Risk of miscarriage after transcervical and transabdominal CVS in relation to bacterial colonization of the cervix.经宫颈和经腹绒毛取样术后流产风险与宫颈细菌定植的关系。
Prenat Diagn. 1991 Aug;11(8):551-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970110810.
8
Chorionic villus sampling by biopsy forceps. Results of 1580 procedures from a single centre.使用活检钳进行绒毛取样。来自单一中心的1580例手术结果。
Prenat Diagn. 1995 Jun;15(6):541-50. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970150607.
9
Risk evaluation in a small series of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.一小系列经腹绒毛取样的风险评估
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;31(4):189-91. doi: 10.1159/000293155.
10
Randomized trial comparing first-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling and second-trimester amniocentesis.比较孕早期经宫颈绒毛取样与孕中期羊膜穿刺术的随机试验。
Prenat Diagn. 1993 Oct;13(10):919-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970131006.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases.8599例高危妊娠晚期绒毛取样的准确性和安全性
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;16(8):860. doi: 10.3390/genes16080860.