• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同解决问题的家庭:青少年对捐赠辅助生育相关交流的看法

Families working it out: adolescents' views on communicating about donor-assisted conception.

作者信息

Kirkman Maggie, Rosenthal Doreen, Johnson Louise

机构信息

Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2318-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem138. Epub 2007 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem138
PMID:17548366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prompted by legislation in Victoria, Australia, permitting gamete donors to seek identifying details of people conceived from their gametes, this research investigated the views of adolescents from the general population on how parents can best talk to their donor-conceived adolescent children about their conception.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews (six group discussions, n = two to six per group, and one individual interview) lasting c. 50 min with 25 secondary school students.

RESULTS

Naïve adolescents had views largely consistent with those of donor-conceived adults, for example, urging parental honesty, adaptation to individual children, and family cohesion. They identified the social father as the parent while acknowledging the significance of genetic connection to the donor. A minority asserted a preference for non-disclosure; all said that, if disclosed, it should be by parents.

CONCLUSIONS

This small study contributes to increasing understanding of communication within families about donor-assisted conception.

摘要

背景

受澳大利亚维多利亚州一项立法的推动,该立法允许配子捐赠者获取由其配子受孕者的身份识别信息,本研究调查了普通人群中的青少年对于父母如何最好地与通过捐赠配子受孕的青春期子女谈论其受孕情况的看法。

方法

对25名中学生进行了时长约50分钟的定性访谈(6次小组讨论,每组2至6人,以及1次个人访谈)。

结果

天真的青少年的观点在很大程度上与通过捐赠配子受孕的成年人一致,例如,敦促父母诚实、根据每个孩子的情况进行调整以及保持家庭凝聚力。他们将社会意义上的父亲视为家长,同时承认与捐赠者的基因联系的重要性。少数人主张倾向于不透露;所有人都说,如果要透露,应该由父母来做。

结论

这项小型研究有助于增进对家庭内部关于捐赠辅助受孕的沟通的理解。

相似文献

1
Families working it out: adolescents' views on communicating about donor-assisted conception.共同解决问题的家庭:青少年对捐赠辅助生育相关交流的看法
Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2318-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem138. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
2
Sharing information with adults conceived as a result of donor insemination.与因供精人工授精而受孕的成年人分享信息。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2006 Jun;9(2):93-9. doi: 10.1080/14647270500509699.
3
The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type.通过精子捐赠受孕的青少年和成年人的经历:按披露年龄和家庭类型进行的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1909-19. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep110. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
4
Disclosure of donor conception in single-mother families: views and concerns.单身母亲家庭中供精受孕信息披露:观点和担忧。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):942-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq018. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
5
Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation.养育通过配子捐赠孕育的婴儿。
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Sep;18(3):443-52. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.443.
6
The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination.供体、父亲与家庭的想象性构成:供精人工授精案例中的父母建构
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):301-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
7
Factors associated with parents' decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring's donor conception.与父母决定告知成年子女有关其供精受孕的决定因素相关。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2783-90. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der247. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
8
Donor insemination: a follow-up study of disclosure decisions, family relationships and child adjustment at adolescence.供精人工授精:对披露决策、家庭关系和青春期儿童适应情况的后续研究。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Aug;25(2):193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Mar 18.
9
Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process.寻找精子捐赠者的后代:家庭类型如何影响这一过程。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep;26(9):2415-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der202. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
10
Parental information sharing with donor insemination conceived offspring: a follow-up study.与供精人工授精所育后代的父母信息共享:一项随访研究。
Hum Reprod. 2009 May;24(5):1099-105. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den495. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Aspects of Therapeutic Donor Insemination.治疗性供精人工授精的社会心理方面
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):315-319. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_108_18.
2
Preference for anonymity in sperm donation for artificial insemination: an experience from low-resource settings in Nigeria.人工授精中精子捐赠时对匿名的偏好:来自尼日利亚资源匮乏地区的经验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Apr 6;12:499-504. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S152868. eCollection 2018.
3
Barriers to Managing Fertility: Findings From the Understanding Fertility Management in Contemporary Australia Facebook Discussion Group.
生育管理的障碍:来自澳大利亚当代生育管理理解脸书讨论组的调查结果
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Feb 15;5(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4492.
4
Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.美国配子捐赠的监管:伦理、法律及社会影响
Laws. 2015 Sep;4(3):352-376. doi: 10.3390/laws4030352.
5
Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in australia: the social context and regulatory framework.澳大利亚的配子与胚胎捐赠及代孕:社会背景与监管框架
Int J Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;4(4):176-83. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
6
Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.关于向配子捐赠所育后代披露捐赠情况的咨询:探寻事实
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(3):159-72.
7
Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.拟议的立法变更要求追溯性披露身份识别信息:与捐赠者的磋商及政府回应
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det434. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
8
An introduction to infertility counseling: a guide for mental health and medical professionals.不孕不育咨询概论:心理健康和医疗专业人员指南。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Mar;29(3):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9701-y.
9
Assessing the health and development of ART-conceived young adults: A study of feasibility, parent recall, and acceptability.评估接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)出生的年轻人的健康与发育:一项关于可行性、父母回忆及可接受性的研究
Reprod Health. 2008 Oct 28;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-5-7.