Lee Ho Yun, Lee Hak Jong, Byun Seok-Soo, Lee Sang Eun, Hong Sung Kyu, Kim Seung Hyup
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):469-72; discussion 472. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.130. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
We evaluated the effect of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study 152 consecutive patients were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 of 41 patients was administered intraprostatic local anesthesia into the right and left sides with a total of 2 ml 1% lidocaine and a periprostatic injection of 2 ml saline later. Group 2 of 49 patients was administered intraprostatic injection of 2 ml saline, followed by periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Group 3 of 62 patients received intraprostatic and periprostatic local anesthesia with 2 ml 1% lidocaine. Patients were asked to grade the pain level using a 10-point linear visual analog pain scale 1) when the transrectal ultrasound probe was inserted, 2) during anesthesia, 3) during biopsy and 4) 20 minutes after biopsy. One-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Tukey post hoc test were used to compare patient characteristics and pain scale responses among the 3 groups.
No major complications, including sepsis and severe rectal bleeding, were noted in any patient. There were statistically significant differences in pain scores among groups 1 to 3 during anesthesia (mean +/- SD 5.6 +/- 2.5, 6.7 +/- 2.3 and 4.9 +/- 2.1, p = 0.003) and during biopsy (4.3 +/- 2.7, 4.5 +/- 2.6 and 2.7 +/- 2.1, respectively, p = 0.032). There were no differences in pain scores among the 3 groups during probe insertion (p = 0.39).
A combination of intracapsular anesthesia and periprostatic nerve block is an effective and useful technique that is well tolerated by the patient. It decreases the level of pain and discomfort associated with the prostatic biopsy procedure.
我们评估了经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中囊内麻醉和前列腺周围神经阻滞的效果。
在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,152例连续患者被随机分为3组。41例患者的第1组,左右两侧前列腺内注射共2 ml 1%利多卡因,随后前列腺周围注射2 ml生理盐水。49例患者的第2组,前列腺内注射2 ml生理盐水,随后前列腺周围注射2 ml 1%利多卡因。62例患者的第3组,前列腺内和前列腺周围均注射2 ml 1%利多卡因。要求患者使用10分线性视觉模拟疼痛量表对疼痛程度进行评分:1)经直肠超声探头插入时,2)麻醉期间,3)活检期间,4)活检后20分钟。采用单因素方差分析以及Kruskal-Wallis检验和Tukey事后检验来比较3组患者的特征和疼痛量表反应。
所有患者均未出现包括败血症和严重直肠出血在内的重大并发症。第1组至第3组在麻醉期间(平均±标准差分别为5.6±2.5、6.7±2.3和4.9±2.1,p = 0.003)和活检期间(分别为4.3±2.7、4.5±2.6和2.7±2.1,p = 0.032)的疼痛评分存在统计学显著差异。3组在探头插入期间的疼痛评分无差异(p = 0.39)。
囊内麻醉和前列腺周围神经阻滞相结合是一种有效且实用的技术,患者耐受性良好。它可降低与前列腺活检操作相关的疼痛和不适程度。