Suppr超能文献

经直肠超声引导前列腺活检术中,盆丛阻滞比前列腺周围神经阻滞更能有效控制疼痛:一项单中心前瞻性随机双盲研究。

Pelvic plexus block is more effective than periprostatic nerve block for pain control during office transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a single center, prospective, randomized, double arm study.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared intrarectal local anesthesia plus pelvic plexus block vs intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 by a computer generated schedule into group 1-90 who received intrarectal local anesthesia (lidocaine 1.5%-nifedipine 0.3% cream) plus pelvic plexus block (2.5 ml lidocaine 1% plus naropine 0.75% injected on each side into the pelvic neurovascular plexus lateral to the seminal vesicle tip) and group 2-90 who received intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block (2.5 ml of the same mixture injected on each side into the neurovascular bundles at the prostate-bladder-seminal vesicle angle) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. After the procedure patients were instructed to rate the level of pain/discomfort from 0 to 10 on the visual analog scale at certain time points, including during the introduction and presence of the probe in the rectum, during pelvic plexus block or periprostatic nerve block, during biopsy and 30 minutes after biopsy.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar in age, serum prostate specific antigen and total prostate volume. There was no difference in pain perception during probe introduction and pelvic plexus or periprostatic nerve block. Pain during prostate biopsy was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p <0.001). The same trend was recorded for pain perception 30 minutes after biopsy (p = 0.001). There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic plexus block under Doppler ultrasound guidance provides better analgesia than periprostatic nerve block during office based transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

摘要

目的

我们比较了经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中直肠内局部麻醉加盆腔丛阻滞与直肠内局部麻醉加前列腺周围神经阻滞的效果。

材料与方法

患者按计算机生成的方案 1:1 随机分为 1 组(90 例)和 2 组(90 例)。1 组患者接受直肠内局部麻醉(利多卡因 1.5%-硝苯地平 0.3%乳膏)加盆腔丛阻滞(每侧向精囊尖端外侧的盆腔神经血管丛注射 2.5 ml 1%利多卡因加 0.75%纳洛酮),2 组患者接受直肠内局部麻醉加前列腺周围神经阻滞(每侧向前列腺-膀胱-精囊角的神经血管束注射 2.5 ml 相同混合物),然后进行经直肠超声引导前列腺活检。在操作后,患者被要求在特定时间点(包括直肠内探头插入和存在期间、盆腔丛阻滞或前列腺周围神经阻滞期间、活检期间和活检后 30 分钟)使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)从 0 到 10 对疼痛/不适程度进行评分。

结果

两组患者在年龄、血清前列腺特异性抗原和总前列腺体积方面相似。探头插入和盆腔丛或前列腺周围神经阻滞时的疼痛感知无差异。1 组患者在前列腺活检期间的疼痛明显低于 2 组(p<0.001)。活检后 30 分钟时的疼痛感知也存在同样的趋势(p=0.001)。无重大并发症。

结论

在经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中,与前列腺周围神经阻滞相比,在多普勒超声引导下进行盆腔丛阻滞可提供更好的镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验