Ingram Rick E, Nelson Tyler, Steidtmann Dana K, Bistricky Steven L
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;75(3):390-403. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.390.
As a way to better understand the effects of treatment for depression, comparative data on measures of cognition have been compiled previously for adults. Such data should be able to aid the evaluation of cognition and cognitive change, and may provide valuable information for clinicians and researchers alike. In this article, analogous comparative data on cognitive measures associated with depression in children and adolescents are presented. The reviewed instruments assess cognitive errors, attributional style, dysfunctional attitudes, hopelessness, negative self-statements, and Beck's negative cognitive triad. As with adults, these data may have implications for enhancing understanding of empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents, may be useful in vulnerability research, and may be useful to clinicians seeking to develop treatment strategies and to gauge treatment effectiveness.
作为一种更好地理解抑郁症治疗效果的方法,之前已收集了关于成年人认知测量的比较数据。这些数据应有助于评估认知及认知变化,并可能为临床医生和研究人员提供有价值的信息。本文呈现了与儿童和青少年抑郁症相关的认知测量的类似比较数据。所审查的工具评估认知错误、归因方式、功能失调性态度、绝望感、消极的自我陈述以及贝克的消极认知三联征。与成年人一样,这些数据可能有助于加深对儿童和青少年循证治疗的理解,可能对脆弱性研究有用,并且可能对寻求制定治疗策略和评估治疗效果的临床医生有用。