Eberhard-Karls-University, Germany.
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Oct;58(4):618-29. doi: 10.1037/a0025092.
There are obvious similarities between the cognitive constructs of A. T. Beck's (1976) cognitive theory and the response style theory (S. Nolen-Hoeksema & J. Morrow, 1991). Different propositions of J. A. Ciesla and J. E. Roberts (2007) and S. Lyubomirsky and S. Nolen-Hoeksema (1993, 1995) concerning associations of 2 response styles, brooding and reflection, with constructs of Beck's cognitive theory (schemata, cognitive errors, cognitive triad, automatic thoughts) were tested. Model comparisons were based on a 4-week study in which 397 participants completed self-report instruments at 2 time points. A model allowing schemata to influence brooding and reflection that influence the other cognitive variables of Beck's cognitive theory fits the data better than the other integrated models. However, although schemata were significant predictors of both response styles, neither response style did significantly predict other cognitive variables. A comparison of the integrated model with Beck's original cognitive theory revealed that Beck's original theory fits the data better than the integrated model, whereas both models explain about the same amount of variance. Thus, an integration of Beck's theory and the response style theory are not supported.
A. T. 贝克(1976)的认知理论和反应风格理论(S. Nolen-Hoeksema 和 J. Morrow,1991)之间存在明显的相似之处。J. A. Ciesla 和 J. E. Roberts(2007)以及 S. Lyubomirsky 和 S. Nolen-Hoeksema(1993、1995)关于两种反应风格(沉思和反思)与贝克认知理论的结构(图式、认知错误、认知三联征、自动思维)之间关联的不同命题进行了检验。模型比较是基于一项为期 4 周的研究,其中 397 名参与者在两个时间点完成了自我报告工具。一个允许图式影响沉思和反思,进而影响贝克认知理论的其他认知变量的模型比其他综合模型更符合数据。然而,尽管图式是两种反应风格的显著预测因素,但这两种反应风格都没有显著预测其他认知变量。将综合模型与贝克的原始认知理论进行比较后发现,贝克的原始理论比综合模型更符合数据,而这两种模型都解释了大致相同的方差。因此,不支持贝克理论和反应风格理论的整合。