Palmieri Patrick A, Smith Gregory C
Summa-Kent State Center for the Treatment and Study of Traumatic Stress, Summa Health System, Akron, OH 44310, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):189-98. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.189.
The authors examined the structural validity of the parent informant version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with a sample of 733 custodial grandparents. Three models of the SDQ's factor structure were evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis based on the item covariance matrix. Although indices of fit were good across all 3 models, a model that included a newly hypothesized positive construal method factor in addition to the 4 symptom factors (Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity-Inattention, Peer Problems) and the single Prosocial Behavior factor originally intended for the SDQ provided the best representation of this instrument's latent structure. Structural validity was further evidenced by measurement invariance across grandparent race and grandchild gender and age, a conceptually meaningful pattern of cross-scale correlations, and the acceptable internal reliability estimates found for each subscale. Measurement and clinical implications of the results are discussed.
作者以733名监护祖父母为样本,检验了优势与困难问卷(SDQ)家长报告版本的结构效度。基于项目协方差矩阵,采用验证性因素分析对SDQ的三种因素结构模型进行了评估。尽管所有三个模型的拟合指数都很好,但一个模型除了4个症状因素(情绪症状、行为问题、多动-注意力不集中、同伴问题)和SDQ原本的单一亲社会行为因素外,还纳入了一个新假设的积极构念方法因素,该模型能最好地呈现该量表的潜在结构。跨祖父母种族以及孙辈性别和年龄的测量不变性、跨量表相关性的概念上有意义的模式,以及各分量表可接受的内部信度估计,进一步证明了结构效度。文中讨论了研究结果的测量和临床意义。