• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福利设计变更对5种疾病状态的影响。

Effects of benefit design change across 5 disease states.

作者信息

Brixner Diana I, Joish Vijay N, Odera Gary M, Avey Steven G, Hanson Douglas M, Cannon H Eric

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):370-6.

PMID:17567238
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of benefit design change (BDC) on medication adherence and persistence (including switch in therapy), drug costs, and total healthcare costs.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed using administrative claims data from an integrated healthcare system between January 2001 and December 2002.

METHODS

Continuously enrolled patients in 2001 and 2002 with allergic rhinitis, asthma, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or osteoarthritis belonged to employer groups with or without a pharmacy BDC as of January 1, 2002. Prescription status (same, switch, or discontinue), adherence among patients receiving therapy, and differences in drug costs and total healthcare costs for each disease state were measured between groups. Bivariate and multivariate statistics were used to test differences in outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the group without BDC, the proportion of patients who discontinued drug therapy was significantly greater in the BDC group among those with allergic rhinitis (67% vs 54%), asthma (66% vs 50%), osteoarthritis (61% vs 36%), and hypertension (39% vs 18%) (P < .05 for all). Medication compliance was not affected by BDC. The year-to-year pharmacy costs per patient in the BDC group decreased $305 for patients with osteoarthritis (P < .001) and $95 for patients with allergic rhinitis (P = .03). There was no significant effect on overall healthcare costs in any disease state during the year following the BDC.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacy BDC may result in decreased pharmacy costs, with no effect on overall healthcare costs within 1 year for patients with allergic rhinitis, asthma, hypertension, or osteoarthritis.

摘要

目的

评估医保福利设计变更(BDC)对药物依从性和持续性(包括治疗方案转换)、药品成本以及总医疗成本的影响。

研究设计

利用一家综合医疗系统2001年1月至2002年12月的管理索赔数据进行回顾性研究。

方法

2001年和2002年持续参保的过敏性鼻炎、哮喘、糖尿病、高血压或骨关节炎患者,截至2002年1月1日,分属有或没有药房BDC的雇主群体。测量两组之间的处方状态(相同、转换或停药)、接受治疗患者的依从性以及每种疾病状态下药品成本和总医疗成本的差异。采用双变量和多变量统计方法检验两组间结果的差异。

结果

与无BDC组相比,BDC组中过敏性鼻炎患者(67%对54%)、哮喘患者(66%对50%)、骨关节炎患者(61%对36%)和高血压患者(39%对18%)中停药患者的比例显著更高(所有P<0.05)。药物依从性不受BDC影响。BDC组中,骨关节炎患者每人每年的药房成本降低305美元(P<0.001),过敏性鼻炎患者降低95美元(P=0.03)。BDC后一年,任何疾病状态下的总体医疗成本均无显著影响。

结论

药房BDC可能会降低药房成本,对过敏性鼻炎、哮喘、高血压或骨关节炎患者1年内的总体医疗成本无影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of benefit design change across 5 disease states.福利设计变更对5种疾病状态的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):370-6.
2
Costs and utilization associated with pharmaceutical adherence in a diabetic population.糖尿病患者群体中与药物依从性相关的成本和利用率。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Feb;10(2 Pt 2):144-51.
3
The effect of the Rx-to-OTC switch of loratadine and changes in prescription drug benefits on utilization and cost of therapy.氯雷他定从处方药转换为非处方药的影响以及处方药福利变化对治疗使用情况和成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jun;11(6):374-82.
4
Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia.增加药物自付费用对退伍军人精神分裂症患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):335-46.
5
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
6
Medication adherence and health care costs with the introduction of latanoprost therapy for glaucoma in a Medicare managed care population.在医疗保险管理式医疗人群中引入拉坦前列素治疗青光眼后的药物依从性和医疗保健成本。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Jun;5(2):100-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.05.004.
7
Asthma-related health care resource use among asthmatic children with and without concomitant allergic rhinitis.有和没有合并过敏性鼻炎的哮喘儿童中与哮喘相关的医疗资源使用情况。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):129-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0067.
8
Effects of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination on asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs and adherence in children and adults with asthma.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药对哮喘儿童和成人哮喘相关医疗资源利用、成本及依从性的影响。
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):560-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.011.
9
Diffusion into use of exenatide for glucose control in diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study of a new therapy.艾塞那肽在糖尿病血糖控制中的应用推广:一项新疗法的回顾性队列研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1784-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.021.
10
Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population.参保人群中酒渣鼻患者的医疗服务利用情况及费用
J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Jan;7(1):41-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Type 2 Diabetes Medication Access and Effect of Patient Cost Sharing.新型2型糖尿病药物的可及性及患者费用分担的影响
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):847-855. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.9.847.
2
Impact of a Novel Cost-Saving Pharmacy Program on Pregabalin Use and Health Care Costs.新型节省成本的药房方案对普瑞巴林使用和医疗保健费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):132-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.15180. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
3
Health economics and cost-effectiveness research with special reference to hemato-oncology.
卫生经济学与成本效益研究,特别涉及血液肿瘤学。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2013 Jul;69(3):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
4
How to use pharmacy claims data to measure patient nonadherence? The example of oral diabetics in therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus.如何利用药房理赔数据来衡量患者的不依从性?以 2 型糖尿病治疗中的口服糖尿病药物为例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jun;14(3):551-68. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0410-y. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.患者费用分担趋势如何影响依从性和治疗结果:一项文献综述。
P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55.
6
Systematic review on quality control for drug management programs: is quality reported in the literature?药物管理项目质量控制的系统评价:文献中是否报道了质量情况?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 25;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-38.
7
Impact of pharmacy benefit design on prescription drug utilization: a fixed effects analysis of plan sponsor data.药学福利设计对处方药使用的影响:对计划赞助商数据的固定效应分析
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):988-1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00943.x. Epub 2009 Jan 28.