Yalçin Sule, Karnak Ibrahim, Ciftci Arbay O, Senocak Mehmet Emin, Tanyel F Cahit, Büyükpamukçu Nebil
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Aug;23(8):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-1958-y. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
Ingestion of a foreign body (FB) is a prevalent condition among children. The type of FB varies according to the feeding habits and sociocultural features of communities. The management modality differs also between disciplines due to use of conventional techniques. We aimed to picture the general characteristics of FB ingestion and treatment alternatives, to mention the indications of open surgery in an advanced pediatric surgical center. The records of patients who were hospitalized for FB ingestion between 1973 and May 2005 were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled into the study. The mean age was 2.27 +/- 2.84 years with a M/F ratio of 59/53. The history was suggestive of ingestion in 92% of patients. The age did not differ significantly whether the history was positive or negative (3.6 years vs. 4.8 years and P = 0.19). Most common presenting symptom was vomiting (28.6%). The duration of symptoms was longer in patients with negative history (median 47.7 h vs. 28.1 h and P < 0.002). Physical examination was normal in 89.3% of cases. Most common localization of the FB shown in plain X-ray was the esophagus (67%). Esophagography revealed nonopaque FB in the esophagus in 4.4%. X-ray was normal in 6.3% of the patients. The age of patient did not determine the localization of FB on admission (P = 0.436). Endoscopic removal was attempted in 75% and was successful in 68% of patients in which FB was extracted by using laryngoscope and Magill forceps (12%), rigid esophagoscope with FB forceps (51%), and flexible endoscope with FB forceps (5%). FB could not be found in 32% of patients at initial rigid esophagoscopy or flexible endoscopy. FB was eliminated spontaneously (n = 19) or extracted surgically (n = 8). Follow-up was preferred in 21% of patients on initial admission. FB proceeded uneventfully in 15 patients or was extracted by flexible endoscopy or surgery in one and eight patients, respectively. Surgery was performed in 4% on admission. Surgery or endoscopy were essentially required in cases whose follow-up period exceeded 4 days when compared with patients who eliminated FB spontaneously within 4 days, independent to the location of FB. The metallic objects were the frequently ingested FBs (83.8%) in which the safety pins (SPs) (n = 53) and coins (n = 25) were the most frequent. The type of FB did not affect the FB localization on admission (P = 0.38). The duration of hospitalization was longer in patients with delayed admission; 2.46 +/- 3.51, 3.80 +/- 8.17, and 5.72 +/- 4.24 days for the admissions within first, second-fifth days, and sixth or later days after ingestion, respectively (P = 0.000). Pediatric surgery has the largest spectrum of duty in the treatment of FB ingestion in children. Negative history, normal physical examination findings and absence of symptoms do not exclude the possibility of FB ingestion. Presentation with isolated respiratory symptoms is an enigma that can lead to misdiagnoses. The mode of management should be selected according to the patient's condition, surgeon's experience, and available technical equipment as well as the location and type of ingested FB. Especially, SPs should be treated by experienced surgeons. Simple extraction techniques and both rigid and flexible endoscopies with appropriate forceps as well as surgery can be used for the extraction of FBs lodged in the alimentary tract. Surgery can be expected especially in asymptomatic cases that have been followed up for more than 4 days irrespective of the location of FB.
吞食异物(FB)在儿童中是一种常见情况。异物的类型因社区的喂养习惯和社会文化特征而异。由于使用传统技术,各学科的管理方式也有所不同。我们旨在描述吞食异物的一般特征和治疗选择,并提及在一家先进的儿科手术中心进行开放手术的指征。对1973年至2005年5月因吞食异物住院的患者记录进行回顾性评估。112名患者纳入研究。平均年龄为2.27±2.84岁,男女比例为59/53。92%的患者病史提示有吞食情况。无论病史阳性或阴性,年龄差异均无统计学意义(3.6岁对4.8岁,P = 0.19)。最常见的表现症状是呕吐(28.6%)。病史阴性患者的症状持续时间更长(中位数47.7小时对28.1小时,P < 0.002)。89.3%的病例体格检查正常。X线平片显示异物最常见的部位是食管(67%)。食管造影显示4.4%的患者食管内有不显影的异物。6.3%的患者X线检查正常。入院时患者年龄与异物部位无关(P = 0.436)。75%的患者尝试内镜取出,其中68%成功,通过喉镜和麦吉尔钳取出异物的占12%,通过硬食管镜和异物钳取出的占51%,通过软式内镜和异物钳取出的占5%。32%的患者在初次硬式食管镜检查或软式内镜检查时未发现异物。异物自行排出(n = 19)或手术取出(n = 8)。21%的患者入院时选择了随访观察。15例患者随访过程顺利,1例和8例患者分别通过软式内镜或手术取出异物。4%的患者入院时即进行了手术。与4天内自行排出异物的患者相比,无论异物位置如何,随访期超过4天的患者基本都需要手术或内镜治疗。金属物品是最常吞食的异物(83.8%),其中安全别针(n = 53)和硬币(n = 25)最为常见。异物类型对入院时异物部位无影响(P = 0.38)。入院延迟的患者住院时间更长;吞食后第1天、第2至5天、第6天及以后入院的患者住院时间分别为2.46±3.51天、3.80±8.17天和5.72±4.24天(P = 0.000)。小儿外科在儿童吞食异物的治疗中承担着最大范围的职责。病史阴性、体格检查正常且无症状并不能排除吞食异物的可能性。以孤立的呼吸道症状就诊是一个可能导致误诊的谜题。治疗方式应根据患者情况、外科医生经验、可用技术设备以及吞食异物的位置和类型来选择。特别是,安全别针应由经验丰富的外科医生处理。简单取出技术以及配备合适钳子的硬式和软式内镜以及手术都可用于取出滞留在消化道的异物。无论异物位置如何,对于随访超过4天的无症状病例尤其可能需要进行手术。