• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低识字水平阿片类药物使用协议的制定与验证

Development and validation of a low-literacy opioid contract.

作者信息

Wallace Lorraine S, Keenum Amy J, Roskos Steven E, McDaniel Kelly S

机构信息

University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):759-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.004
PMID:17569596
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Opioid contracts (OPCs) are often used to outline the criteria and circumstances for which opioid medications are prescribed. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an English-language, low-literacy OPC. Specifically, the low-literacy OPC was designed to outline proper administration of prescribed medication(s) as well as highlight patient responsibilities and expectations. A 4-step process was used to develop and validate the low-literacy OPC, including: (1) content identification; (2) attention to low-literacy guidelines; (3) evaluation based on Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) criteria; and (4) pilot testing with patients (n = 18) to assess comprehension. Final OPC content, presented largely in bulleted format, was based on current literature and consensus of the first 3 authors. The 4-part OPC was formatted on 8(1/2) x 11 inch paper using 16- to 24-point size Arial-style font. The 6-page OPC, written at the 7(th) reading grade level, included 12 recognizable clipart-type illustrations to supplement written text. Two reviewers scored the OPC in the superior range based on total SAM percentage scores. Nineteen (n = 19) of the 26 statements were comprehended by all patients completing the pilot testing. Overall, the low-literacy OPC is comprehensive, valid, readable, and formatted according to established low-literacy guidelines.

PERSPECTIVE

This study describes the development and validation of a low-literacy, English-language OPC. The OPC was formatted using low-literacy guidelines and validated with a sample of patients to confirm understanding of content. Accordingly, the low-literacy OPC is suitable for use in routine clinical practice.

摘要

未标注

阿片类药物使用协议(OPC)常被用于概述开具阿片类药物的标准和情况。本研究的目的是开发并验证一份英文的、针对低文化水平者的OPC。具体而言,这份针对低文化水平者的OPC旨在概述所开药物的正确服用方法,并强调患者的责任和期望。我们采用了一个四步骤流程来开发并验证这份针对低文化水平者的OPC,包括:(1)内容确定;(2)遵循低文化水平指南;(3)根据材料适用性评估(SAM)标准进行评估;(4)对患者(n = 18)进行预测试以评估理解情况。最终的OPC内容主要以项目符号格式呈现,基于当前文献以及前三位作者的共识。这份四部分的OPC采用8.5 x 11英寸纸张排版,使用16至24磅字号的Arial字体。这份6页的OPC以七年级阅读水平编写,包含12幅可识别的剪贴画式插图以辅助文字内容。两位评审者根据SAM总分将这份OPC评为优秀等级。完成预测试的所有患者中,26条陈述里有19条被理解。总体而言,这份针对低文化水平者的OPC内容全面、有效、易读,且符合既定的低文化水平指南。

观点

本研究描述了一份针对低文化水平者的英文OPC的开发与验证过程。该OPC依据低文化水平指南进行排版,并通过对一组患者进行验证以确认其对内容的理解。因此,这份针对低文化水平者的OPC适用于常规临床实践。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a low-literacy opioid contract.低识字水平阿片类药物使用协议的制定与验证
J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):759-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
2
Literacy demands and formatting characteristics of opioid contracts in chronic nonmalignant pain management.慢性非恶性疼痛管理中阿片类药物使用协议的读写能力要求和格式特征
J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
3
Literacy as the foundation of patient responsibility.读写能力是患者责任的基础。
J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):824-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.07.004.
4
Development of injury prevention materials for people with low literacy skills.为低识字技能人群开发伤害预防材料。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 May 24.
5
A critical review of FDA-approved Medication Guides.对美国食品药品监督管理局批准的用药指南的批判性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
6
Development and pilot testing of a disease management program for low literacy patients with heart failure.针对低识字率心力衰竭患者的疾病管理项目的开发与试点测试。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Oct;55(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.06.002.
7
Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?临终患者教育材料是否具有可读性?
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):545-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216309106313. Epub 2009 May 21.
8
[Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].[高血压印刷教育材料的适用性和可读性评估]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011 Jun;41(3):333-43. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.333.
9
The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations.格式修改和阅读理解对低收入父母回忆知情同意信息的影响:纸质、视频和基于计算机的演示文稿的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 May;53(2):205-16. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00162-9.
10
Suitability and readability of consumer medical information accompanying prescription medication samples.处方药样品附带的消费者医疗信息的适用性和可读性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.017.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.患者的收入和教育水平与其获得慢性疼痛药物治疗的关系:一项范围综述。
Can J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):142-170. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699. eCollection 2022.
2
How Do Clinicians of Different Specialties Perceive and Use Opioid Risk Mitigation Strategies? A Qualitative Study.不同专业的临床医生如何感知和使用阿片类药物风险缓解策略?一项定性研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(9):1352-1362. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1926514. Epub 2021 May 22.
3
Developing and Initiating Validation of a Model Opioid Patient-Prescriber Agreement as a Tool for Patient-Centered Pain Treatment.
开发并启动一种阿片类药物患者-开处方者协议模型的验证,作为以患者为中心的疼痛治疗工具。
Patient. 2015 Aug;8(4):349-58. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0094-8.
4
It made my life a little easier: primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements.这让我的生活轻松了一些:初级保健提供者对使用阿片类药物治疗协议的信念和态度。
J Opioid Manag. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):95-102. doi: 10.5055/jom.2014.0198.
5
Power and control: contracts and the patient-physician relationship.权力与控制:合同与医患关系。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;65(12):1214-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02762.x.
6
Prescribing of opioid analgesics and related mortality before and after the introduction of long-acting oxycodone.在长效羟考酮推出前后,阿片类镇痛药的处方和相关死亡率。
CMAJ. 2009 Dec 8;181(12):891-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090784. Epub 2009 Dec 7.