Suppr超能文献

[高血压印刷教育材料的适用性和可读性评估]

[Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].

作者信息

Lee Tae Wha, Kang Soo Jin, Kim Hye Hyun, Woo So Ra, Kim Sinhye

机构信息

College of Nursing, Nursing Policy Research Institute Yonsei University, and Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011 Jun;41(3):333-43. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.333.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the suitability and readability of printed educational materials for patients with hypertension in Korea.

METHODS

A total of 33 written educational materials related to hypertension were collected from public health centers, hospitals, and internet web site. Among them, we analyzed 19 materials which fit the inclusion criteria: leaflets (n=9), booklets (n=3), and guide book (n=7). Two trained nurses evaluate the materials using suitability assessment tool (SAM; Doak, Doak, & Root, 1996a) and graded lexical items for teaching Korean (Kim, 2003).

RESULTS

Overall, 14 (73.7%) of 19 materials scored adequate, and 5 (26.3%) scored inadequate. On the average, the education materials contained 36.1% to 50.5% of 1st grade reading level words and 12.9% to 21.6% of 4th grade level and over.

CONCLUSION

The reading level of the materials was higher than a 6th grade reading level. It is proposed that the written educational materials should be developed by health professionals according to suitability and quality by taking the target group's literacy capacity into consideration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估韩国高血压患者印刷版教育材料的适用性和可读性。

方法

从公共卫生中心、医院和网站收集了33份与高血压相关的书面教育材料。其中,我们分析了19份符合纳入标准的材料:传单(n = 9)、小册子(n = 3)和指南(n = 7)。两名经过培训的护士使用适用性评估工具(SAM;Doak、Doak和Root,1996a)以及韩语教学分级词汇项目(Kim,2003)对这些材料进行评估。

结果

总体而言,19份材料中有14份(73.7%)得分合格,5份(26.3%)得分不合格。这些教育材料平均包含36.1%至50.5%的一年级阅读水平词汇以及12.9%至21.6%的四年级及以上水平词汇。

结论

这些材料的阅读水平高于六年级阅读水平。建议卫生专业人员根据适用性和质量,考虑目标群体的识字能力来编写书面教育材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验