Wetzel W, Geck M, Duncker G, Bernsmeier H
Universitäts-Augenklinik, Kiel, Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1991;88(5):509-12.
A total of 44 eyes of patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension were examined both by ocular pressure tonometry (OPT) according to Ulrich and by tonography according to Leydhecker. The visual fields of these eyes were prospectively followed up for 3 years to compare the prognostic value of the two methods. In 30 of the 44 eyes a worsening visual field loss was observed, while in 14 the visual fields showed no change. Much better correlation was noted between values obtained by OPT and changes in visual field than between values obtained by tonography and visual field loss. Conventional tonography yielded 39% of false-negative values, but only 11% were recorded with OPT. Therefore, according to results of these and further investigations, OPT appears to be a more helpful and reliable method for assessment and decisions on therapy in patients with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
对44例疑似青光眼或高眼压症患者的眼睛,分别采用乌尔里希眼压测量法(OPT)和莱德克眼压描记法进行检查。对这些眼睛的视野进行了为期3年的前瞻性随访,以比较这两种方法的预后价值。在44只眼中,有30只观察到视野恶化,而14只眼的视野无变化。OPT测得的值与视野变化之间的相关性比眼压描记法测得的值与视野损失之间的相关性要好得多。传统眼压描记法产生了39%的假阴性值,但OPT仅记录到11%。因此,根据这些及进一步研究的结果,OPT似乎是评估疑似青光眼或高眼压症患者并决定治疗方案更有用、更可靠的方法。