Donoghue Philip C J, Benton Michael J
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
A great tradition in macroevolution and systematics has been the ritual squabbling between palaeontologists and molecular biologists. But, because both sides were talking past each other, they could never agree. Practitioners in both fields should play to their strengths and work together: palaeontologists can provide minimum constraints on branching points in the Tree of Life with considerable precision, and estimate the extent of unrecorded prehistory. Molecular tree analysts have remarkable modelling tools in their armoury to convert multiple minimum age constraints into meaningful dated trees. As we discuss here, work should now focus on establishing reasonable, dated trees that satisfy rigorous assessment of the available fossils and careful consideration of molecular tree methods: rocks and clocks together are an unbeatable combination. Reliably dated trees provide, for the first time, the opportunity to explore wider questions in macroevolution.
在宏观进化和系统学领域,古生物学家和分子生物学家之间一直存在着习惯性的争论。但是,由于双方各说各话,始终无法达成一致。两个领域的从业者应该发挥各自的优势并携手合作:古生物学家能够相当精确地为生命之树的分支点提供最小限制条件,并估算未被记录的史前历史的范围。分子树分析人员拥有出色的建模工具,可将多个最小年龄限制条件转化为有意义的带时间标记的树。正如我们在此所讨论的,现在的工作应聚焦于建立合理的、带时间标记的树,这些树要满足对现有化石的严格评估以及对分子树方法的审慎考量:岩石和时钟相结合是无与伦比的组合。可靠的带时间标记的树首次为探索宏观进化中更广泛的问题提供了机会。