Collins Alan
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Alan Collins, Department of Psychology, University of Lancaster, LAl 4YF, United Kingdom.
Hist Psychol. 2007 Feb;10(1):44-72. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.10.1.44.
"Information" has become a widely used term in psychology, especially within cognitive psychology. However, despite its status as a technical term, the word now rarely receives explicit definition. By contrast, when information entered the vocabulary of psychologists in the late 1940s, it had an explicit mathematical definition largely derived from developments in information theory. This article examines how information entered psychology, how its meaning changed, and how it remained a technical term in the vocabulary of psychologists in the second part of the 20th century. "Information" became a term that was required to speak to ever more diverse theoretical concerns and its earliest definitions in psychology could not sustain such uses. As a consequence, "information" became a term whose technical uses became increasingly difficult to differentiate from its everyday meanings. I argue that this has not necessarily made "information" a worthless term but one whose lack of specificity may now be unsettling to some psychologists.
“信息”已成为心理学中广泛使用的术语,尤其是在认知心理学领域。然而,尽管它作为一个专业术语存在,但这个词如今很少得到明确的定义。相比之下,当“信息”在20世纪40年代末进入心理学家的词汇表时,它有一个明确的数学定义,这一定义很大程度上源于信息论的发展。本文探讨了信息是如何进入心理学领域的,其含义是如何变化的,以及在20世纪后半叶它如何在心理学家的词汇表中仍然作为一个专业术语存在。“信息”成为了一个需要应对越来越多样化理论问题的术语,而它在心理学中最早的定义无法支撑这样的使用。因此,“信息”这个术语的专业用法越来越难以与它的日常含义区分开来。我认为,这不一定使“信息”成为一个毫无价值的术语,而是一个其缺乏明确性现在可能令一些心理学家感到不安的术语。