• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于医生对胆固醇管理认知的全球调查:“发自内心”研究

A global survey of physicians' perceptions on cholesterol management: the From The Heart study.

作者信息

Erhardt L R, Hobbs F D R

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;61(7):1078-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01420.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01420.x
PMID:17577295
Abstract

AIMS

Guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention cite high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as a major risk factor and recommend LDL-C goals for various risk groups. Lifestyle changes are advised as first-line treatment for patients with high cholesterol, and statins are recommended in high-risk patients. The From The Heart study investigated current practice for the diagnosis and treatment of high cholesterol, and attitudes towards management of the condition.

METHODS

Physicians were randomly selected from 10 countries, and completed a confidential, semi-structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 2790 physicians agreeing to participate, 750 (27%) responded. Physicians rated CVD as the leading cause of death, although physicians (80%) perceived that cancer was the most feared illness among patients. Physicians (71%) believed smoking to be the greatest CVD risk factor, while only 50% thought high cholesterol was the greatest risk. Most physicians (81%) used guidelines to set cholesterol goals, primarily their national guidelines (34%) or the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (24%). Although only 47% of patients reached and maintained their cholesterol goals, 61% of physicians believed that a sufficient number of patients achieved goals, and 53% did not feel frustrated that they could not always effectively treat patients with CVD.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate discrepancies between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Although physicians appreciate the risk of CVD, the importance of achieving healthy cholesterol levels for CVD prevention does not seem to be widely endorsed. There is a need for improved communication regarding the importance of cholesterol lowering and investigation of initiatives to improve goal achievement among physicians.

摘要

目的

心血管疾病(CVD)预防指南将低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平升高列为主要危险因素,并针对不同风险群体推荐了LDL-C目标。建议生活方式改变作为高胆固醇患者的一线治疗方法,高危患者推荐使用他汀类药物。“发自内心”研究调查了高胆固醇诊断和治疗的当前实践以及对该疾病管理的态度。

方法

从10个国家随机选择医生,并完成一份保密的半结构化问卷。

结果

在2790名同意参与的医生中,750名(27%)做出了回应。医生将CVD列为主要死因,尽管医生(80%)认为癌症是患者最恐惧的疾病。医生(71%)认为吸烟是最大的CVD危险因素,而只有50%的医生认为高胆固醇是最大风险。大多数医生(81%)使用指南来设定胆固醇目标,主要是本国指南(34%)或国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组第三次指南(24%)。尽管只有47%的患者达到并维持了他们的胆固醇目标,但61%的医生认为有足够数量的患者实现了目标,并且53%的医生对于不能总是有效治疗CVD患者并不感到沮丧。

结论

结果表明指南建议与临床实践之间存在差异。尽管医生认识到CVD的风险,但实现健康胆固醇水平对预防CVD的重要性似乎并未得到广泛认可。需要就降低胆固醇的重要性进行更好的沟通,并对提高医生中目标达成率的举措进行调查。

相似文献

1
A global survey of physicians' perceptions on cholesterol management: the From The Heart study.一项关于医生对胆固醇管理认知的全球调查:“发自内心”研究
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;61(7):1078-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01420.x.
2
Exploring the gap between National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines and clinical practice in secondary care: results of a cross-sectional study involving over 10 000 patients followed in different specialty settings across Italy.探索国家胆固醇教育计划指南与二级医疗保健临床实践之间的差距:一项横断面研究的结果,该研究涉及意大利不同专科环境下随访的1万多名患者。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Sep;9(9):878-87. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3282f56513.
3
Lipid treatment assessment project 2: a multinational survey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.脂质治疗评估项目2:一项评估实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的患者比例的跨国调查。
Circulation. 2009 Jul 7;120(1):28-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.838466. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
4
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.近期临床试验对美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组第三次指南的影响。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 Aug;24(8):e149-61. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000133317.49796.0E.
5
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines.近期临床试验对美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组第三次指南的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):720-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.001.
6
Cholesterol complacency in Australia: time to revisit the basics of cardiovascular disease prevention.澳大利亚的胆固醇自满情绪:是时候重新审视心血管疾病预防的基础知识了。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(5):678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02507.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Achieving vascular risk factor targets: a survey of a London general practice.实现血管危险因素目标:对伦敦一家全科诊所的调查。
Angiology. 2008 Feb-Mar;59(1):36-46. doi: 10.1177/0003319707309538.
8
Cardiovascular risk reduction: what do recent trials with rosuvastatin tell us?心血管风险降低:瑞舒伐他汀的最新试验告诉了我们什么?
Adv Ther. 2009 May;26(5):469-87. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0025-6. Epub 2009 May 14.
9
Gap between guidelines and practice: attainment of treatment targets in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia starting statin therapy. Results of the 4E-Registry (Efficacy Calculation and Measurement of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events Including Physicians' Experience and Evaluation).指南与实践之间的差距:开始他汀类药物治疗的原发性高胆固醇血症患者治疗目标的达成情况。4E注册研究(包括医生经验与评估的心血管和脑血管事件疗效计算与测量)的结果
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Oct;13(5):776-83. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000189805.76482.6e.
10
The From The Heart study: a global survey of patient understanding of cholesterol management and cardiovascular risk, and physician-patient communication.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1267-78. doi: 10.1185/030079908x280491. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of physician characteristics and knowledge on the quality of dyslipidemia management and LDL-C target goal achievement in China: Subgroup analysis of the Dyslipidemia International Study.医生特征和知识对中国血脂异常管理质量及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标达成的影响:血脂异常国际研究的亚组分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020702. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020702.
2
Awareness, knowledge and practice of dyslipidaemia management among postgraduate primary care trainees in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚初级保健研究生培训学员对血脂异常管理的认知、知识和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 1;7(3):e013573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013573.
3
Mixed methods evaluation of targeted case finding for cardiovascular disease prevention using a stepped wedged cluster RCT.
采用阶梯式楔形集群 RCT 对心血管疾病预防进行目标性病例发现的混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 26;12:908. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-908.
4
Barriers to cardiovascular risk prevention and management in Germany--an analysis of the EURIKA study.德国心血管疾病风险预防与管理的障碍——EURIKA研究分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:177-86. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S29915. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Lipid-lowering drugs as primary prevention in general practice: do patients reach guideline goals and continue treatment? ADDITION Denmark.降脂药物作为一般实践中的初级预防:患者是否达到指南目标并继续治疗?丹麦 ADDITION 研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):216-21. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.629148.
6
High total serum cholesterol, medication coverage and therapeutic control: an analysis of national health examination survey data from eight countries.高总血清胆固醇、药物覆盖率和治疗控制:八个国家国家健康检查调查数据的分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Feb 1;89(2):92-101. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.079947. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
7
Rationale and methods of the European Study on Cardiovascular Risk Prevention and Management in Daily Practice (EURIKA).EURIKA 研究:欧洲日常实践中心血管风险预防与管理的原理和方法。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 30;10:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-382.
8
General practitioners' adherence to guidelines on management of dyslipidaemia: ADDITION-Denmark.丹麦 ADDITION 研究:基层医生对血脂异常管理指南的遵循情况。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):47-54. doi: 10.3109/02813430903335216.
9
A novel programme to evaluate and communicate 10-year risk of CHD reduces predicted risk and improves patients' modifiable risk factor profile.一项评估并传达冠心病10年风险的新计划降低了预测风险,并改善了患者可改变的风险因素状况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;62(10):1484-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01872.x. Epub 2008 Aug 7.