• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦 ADDITION 研究:基层医生对血脂异常管理指南的遵循情况。

General practitioners' adherence to guidelines on management of dyslipidaemia: ADDITION-Denmark.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, School of Public Health. University of Aarhus, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):47-54. doi: 10.3109/02813430903335216.

DOI:10.3109/02813430903335216
PMID:19929180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440615/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the management of dyslipidaemia in patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and patients with a history of CVD identified by screening for diabetes in general practice in Denmark, concentrating on prescription of lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, to analyse predicting factors for starting lipid-lowering drugs related to patient and general practice characteristics.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study with follow-up.

SETTING

A total of 139 general practices from three of five Danish regions, totalling 216 GPs.

SUBJECTS

The study population comprised 4986 patients with a high risk of CVD and dyslipidaemia and 764 patients with a history of CVD and dyslipidaemia out of a population of 16 572 patients who completed screening for diabetes but were cleared for diabetes in the ADDITION study.

RESULTS

Of patients with a high risk of CVD and dyslipidaemia not receiving lipid-lowering drugs at the time of screening (n = 4823), 20% started lipid-lowering therapy within the follow-up period (median 2.1 years). This percentage was 45% (n = 536) for patients with CVD and dyslipidaemia (median follow-up period 1.6 years). Age over 50, high cholesterol, impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance, minor polypharmacy, use of heart/circulation drugs, and cholesterol measurements after screening predicted the prescription of lipid-lowering drugs for patients at high risk of CVD. For patients with CVD, male gender, high cholesterol and use of heart/circulation drugs predicted the prescription of lipid-lowering drugs. No general practice characteristics were associated with different prescription habits.

CONCLUSION

There is a gap between the recommended lipid-lowering drug therapy and current practice, with a substantial under-treatment and a considerable delay in the first prescription of lipid-lowering drugs.

摘要

目的

描述丹麦普通实践中通过糖尿病筛查发现的高心血管疾病(CVD)风险患者和 CVD 病史患者的血脂异常管理,重点关注降脂药物的处方。此外,分析与患者和普通实践特征相关的开始降脂药物的预测因素。

设计

基于人群的横断面研究,随访。

地点

丹麦五个地区中的三个地区的总共 139 个普通实践,共有 216 名全科医生。

受试者

该研究人群包括 4986 名高 CVD 和血脂异常风险且正在接受筛查的患者,以及 764 名患有 CVD 和血脂异常病史但在 ADDITION 研究中筛查出无糖尿病的患者。

结果

在筛查时未服用降脂药物的高 CVD 和血脂异常风险患者中(n=4823),20%在随访期间开始降脂治疗(中位时间为 2.1 年)。对于患有 CVD 和血脂异常的患者,这一比例为 45%(n=536)(中位随访时间为 1.6 年)。年龄超过 50 岁、高胆固醇、空腹血糖受损和/或葡萄糖耐量受损、轻度多种药物治疗、使用心脏/循环药物以及筛查后的胆固醇测量值预测了高 CVD 风险患者的降脂药物处方。对于 CVD 患者,男性、高胆固醇和使用心脏/循环药物预测了降脂药物的处方。普通实践特征与不同的处方习惯无关。

结论

推荐的降脂药物治疗与当前实践之间存在差距,存在大量未治疗和降脂药物首次处方的明显延迟。

相似文献

1
General practitioners' adherence to guidelines on management of dyslipidaemia: ADDITION-Denmark.丹麦 ADDITION 研究:基层医生对血脂异常管理指南的遵循情况。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):47-54. doi: 10.3109/02813430903335216.
2
Lipid-lowering drugs as primary prevention in general practice: do patients reach guideline goals and continue treatment? ADDITION Denmark.降脂药物作为一般实践中的初级预防:患者是否达到指南目标并继续治疗?丹麦 ADDITION 研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):216-21. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.629148.
3
Drug prescription rates in secondary cardiovascular prevention in old age: Do vulnerability and severity of the history of cardiovascular disease matter?老年二级心血管预防中的药物处方率:心血管疾病病史的脆弱性和严重程度有影响吗?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):260-8. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1117281.
4
Time to improve statin prescription guidelines in low-risk patients?是时候改进低风险患者的他汀类药物处方指南了吗?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jul;24(10):1064-1070. doi: 10.1177/2047487317698585. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Variation in prescribing of lipid-lowering medication in primary care is associated with incidence of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in people with screen-detected diabetes: findings from the ADDITION-Denmark trial.初级保健中降脂药物处方的差异与筛查发现的糖尿病患者的心血管疾病发病率和全因死亡率相关:来自丹麦ADDITION试验的结果。
Diabet Med. 2014 Dec;31(12):1577-85. doi: 10.1111/dme.12574. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
6
How do the Australian guidelines for lipid-lowering drugs perform in practice? Cardiovascular disease risk in the AusDiab Study, 1999-2000.澳大利亚降血脂药物指南在实际应用中表现如何?1999 - 2000年澳大利亚糖尿病研究中的心血管疾病风险。
Med J Aust. 2008 Sep 15;189(6):319-22. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02049.x.
7
Prescription of lipid-lowering medications for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk-associated LDL cholesterol: a nationwide study of guideline adherence from the Swedish National Diabetes Register.2型糖尿病患者及伴有风险的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇患者的降脂药物处方:一项基于瑞典国家糖尿病登记处的全国性指南依从性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 28;18(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3707-4.
8
Under-prescription of statins in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者他汀类药物处方不足。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Feb;27(2):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Extent of undertreatment and overtreatment with cholesterol-lowering therapy according to European guidelines in 92,348 Danes without ischemic cardiovascular disease and diabetes in 2004-2014.2004-2014 年,92348 名无缺血性心血管疾病和糖尿病的丹麦人按照欧洲指南,在降脂治疗中存在治疗不足和过度治疗的情况。
Atherosclerosis. 2017 Feb;257:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
The evaluation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals achieved in patients with established cardiovascular disease and/or hyperlipidaemia receiving lipid-lowering therapy: the South African Not at Goal study (SA-NAG).对接受降脂治疗的已确诊心血管疾病和/或高脂血症患者实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标情况的评估:南非未达目标研究(SA-NAG)
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(2):88-94.

引用本文的文献

1
LDL-cholesterol trajectories and statin treatment in Finnish type 2 diabetes patients: a growth mixture model.芬兰 2 型糖尿病患者的 LDL-胆固醇轨迹和他汀类药物治疗:增长混合模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 19;11(1):22603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02077-6.
2
Effect of population screening for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors on mortality rate and cardiovascular events: a controlled trial among 1,912,392 Danish adults.人群筛查 2 型糖尿病和心血管危险因素对死亡率和心血管事件的影响:一项针对 1912392 名丹麦成年人的对照试验。
Diabetologia. 2017 Nov;60(11):2183-2191. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4323-2. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Drug prescription rates in secondary cardiovascular prevention in old age: Do vulnerability and severity of the history of cardiovascular disease matter?老年二级心血管预防中的药物处方率:心血管疾病病史的脆弱性和严重程度有影响吗?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):260-8. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1117281.
4
GPs' Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk and Views on Patient Compliance: A Qualitative Interview Study.全科医生对心血管风险的认知及对患者依从性的看法:一项定性访谈研究
Int J Family Med. 2015;2015:214146. doi: 10.1155/2015/214146. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
Communicating risk using absolute risk reduction or prolongation of life formats: cluster-randomised trial in general practice.采用绝对风险降低或生命延长形式传达风险:全科医疗中的整群随机试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Apr;64(621):e199-207. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677824.
6
Gender disparities in diabetes and coronary heart disease medication among patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the DIANA study.2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病和冠心病药物治疗中的性别差异:来自 DIANA 研究的结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jul 27;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-88.
7
Too much health care and too little care for the sick?医疗保健过多,对病人的关怀过少?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Jun;30(2):62-3. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.681254.
8
The medico-professional quality of GP consultations assessed by analysing patient records.通过分析患者记录评估全科医生咨询的医学专业质量。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):222-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.628241.
9
Lipid-lowering drugs as primary prevention in general practice: do patients reach guideline goals and continue treatment? ADDITION Denmark.降脂药物作为一般实践中的初级预防:患者是否达到指南目标并继续治疗?丹麦 ADDITION 研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):216-21. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.629148.
10
HbA1c and cardiovascular risk score identify people who may benefit from preventive interventions: a 7 year follow-up of a high-risk screening programme for diabetes in primary care (ADDITION), Denmark.糖化血红蛋白和心血管风险评分可识别可能受益于预防干预的人群:丹麦初级保健中糖尿病高危人群筛查项目(ADDITION)的 7 年随访结果。
Diabetologia. 2011 Jun;54(6):1318-26. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2077-9. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.与参加 2 型糖尿病筛查计划相关的社会经济因素。
Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x.
2
Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients.他汀类药物治疗对心血管死亡率和事件的一级预防:一项纳入超过65000例患者的网状Meta分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 25;52(22):1769-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.039.
3
Secular trends in cardiovascular risk factors with a 36-year perspective: observations from 38- and 50-year-olds in the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg.36年视角下心血管危险因素的长期趋势:哥德堡妇女人群研究中38岁和50岁人群的观察结果
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):140-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430802088403.
4
Barriers to adherence to hypertension guidelines among GPs in southern Sweden: a survey.瑞典南部全科医生遵守高血压指南的障碍:一项调查
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):154-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430802202111.
5
A global survey of physicians' perceptions on cholesterol management: the From The Heart study.一项关于医生对胆固醇管理认知的全球调查:“发自内心”研究
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;61(7):1078-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01420.x.
6
Knowledge and perception of guidelines and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease among general practitioners and internists. Results from a physician survey in Germany.全科医生和内科医生对冠心病指南及二级预防的认知与理解。德国一项医生调查的结果。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Dec;12(6):521-9. doi: 10.1097/00149831-200512000-00002.
7
Long-term impact of elevated cardiovascular risk detected by screening. A qualitative interview study.筛查发现的心血管风险升高的长期影响。一项定性访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005 Dec;23(4):233-8. doi: 10.1080/02813430500336245.
8
Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.降低胆固醇治疗的疗效与安全性:对他汀类药物14项随机试验中90,056名参与者数据的前瞻性荟萃分析
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1267-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
9
Population-based stepwise screening for unrecognised Type 2 diabetes is ineffective in general practice despite reliable algorithms.尽管有可靠的算法,但在全科医疗中,基于人群的逐步筛查未被识别的2型糖尿病的方法效果不佳。
Diabetologia. 2004 Sep;47(9):1566-73. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1496-2. Epub 2004 Sep 8.
10
Undertreatment and overtreatment with statins: the Oslo Health Study 2000-2001.他汀类药物治疗不足与过度治疗:2000 - 2001年奥斯陆健康研究
J Intern Med. 2004 Apr;255(4):494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01315.x.