Emons Wilco H M, Meijer Rob R, Denollet Johan
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Jul;63(1):27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.03.010.
Individuals with increased levels of both negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI)-referred to as type-D personality-are at increased risk of adverse cardiac events. We used item response theory (IRT) to evaluate NA, SI, and type-D personality as measured by the DS14. The objectives of this study were (a) to evaluate the relative contribution of individual items to the measurement precision at the cutoff to distinguish type-D from non-type-D personality and (b) to investigate the comparability of NA, SI, and type-D constructs across the general population and clinical populations.
Data from representative samples including 1316 respondents from the general population, 427 respondents diagnosed with coronary heart disease, and 732 persons suffering from hypertension were analyzed using the graded response IRT model.
In Study 1, the information functions obtained in the IRT analysis showed that (a) all items had highest measurement precision around the cutoff and (b) items are most informative at the higher end of the scale. In Study 2, the IRT analysis showed that measurements were fairly comparable across the general population and clinical populations.
The DS14 adequately measures NA and SI, with highest reliability in the trait range around the cutoff. The DS14 is a valid instrument to assess and compare type-D personality across clinical groups.
消极情感性(NA)和社交抑制(SI)水平均升高的个体——即D型人格——发生不良心脏事件的风险增加。我们使用项目反应理论(IRT)来评估由DS14量表测量的NA、SI和D型人格。本研究的目的是:(a)评估各个项目在区分D型与非D型人格的临界值处对测量精度的相对贡献;(b)研究在普通人群和临床人群中NA、SI和D型人格结构的可比性。
使用等级反应IRT模型分析来自代表性样本的数据,这些样本包括1316名普通人群受访者、427名被诊断为冠心病的受访者以及732名高血压患者。
在研究1中,IRT分析获得的信息函数表明:(a)所有项目在临界值附近具有最高的测量精度;(b)项目在量表的较高端信息性最强。在研究2中,IRT分析表明,普通人群和临床人群的测量结果具有相当程度的可比性。
DS14能够充分测量NA和SI,在临界值附近的特质范围内可靠性最高。DS14是评估和比较不同临床组中D型人格的有效工具。