Fassett Robert G, Robertson Iain K, Geraghty Dominic P, Ball Madeleine J, Coombes Jeff S
School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Ren Nutr. 2007 Jul;17(4):235-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2007.04.004.
The study objective was to determine the dietary intake of patients with chronic kidney disease before and after filtering for suspected underreporters and to investigate the impact of underreporting on the interpretation of diet data.
This was a cross-sectional study.
The study included outpatients from hospitals and clinics in Northern Tasmania, Australia.
Data from 113 patients enrolled in the Lipid Lowering and Onset of Renal Disease trial were used in this study. Patients with serum creatinine greater than 120 mmol/L were included, and those taking lipid-lowering medication were excluded.
Patients completed a 4-day self-report diet diary, and FoodWorks software was used to determine their daily intake of energy, macronutrients, and specific micronutrients. Diet diaries were assessed for likely underreporting using the Goldberg cutoff approach with a ratio of energy intake to estimated resting energy expenditure of 1.27. Nutrient intakes were compared with current National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines, World Health Organization recommendations, recommended daily allowances, and daily values adjusted for energy intake.
Demographics of the patients were as follows: male/female, 71/42; age (mean +/- standard deviation), 60 +/- 15 years; body mass index, 28.6 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2), and serum creatinine, 223.4 +/- 110.0 mmol/L. According to the criteria, 80 patients (70.8%) were underreporting their energy intake. Underreporters were more likely to be female and younger, and have a higher body mass index and elevated serum creatinine. In all patients, daily energy intake (89.6 +/- 32.4 kJ/kg) was lower than recommended (125-145 kJ/kg); however, this was not the case for valid reporters (128.3 +/- 23.7 kJ/kg). Protein intake was higher (0.9 +/- 0.3 g/kg) than recommended (0.75 g/kg) in all patients and even higher (1.2 +/- 0.3 g/kg) in valid reporters. Mean calcium, zinc, and dietary fiber intakes were all below recommendations in all patients, but these differences were not apparent in valid reporters.
Interpreting self-report diet diary data from patients with chronic kidney disease without attempting to exclude underreporters will lead to erroneous conclusions, especially in respect to energy, protein, dietary fiber, calcium, and zinc intakes.
本研究的目的是确定慢性肾病患者在筛选可疑低报者前后的饮食摄入量,并调查低报对饮食数据解读的影响。
这是一项横断面研究。
该研究纳入了澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚岛北部医院和诊所的门诊患者。
本研究使用了参与降脂与肾病发病试验的113名患者的数据。纳入血清肌酐大于120 mmol/L的患者,排除正在服用降脂药物的患者。
患者完成一份为期4天的自我报告饮食日记,并使用FoodWorks软件确定他们每日的能量、宏量营养素和特定微量营养素摄入量。使用戈德堡临界值法,以能量摄入量与估计静息能量消耗的比值为1.27,评估饮食日记是否可能存在低报情况。将营养素摄入量与当前美国国家肾脏基金会的肾病预后质量倡议指南、世界卫生组织的建议、推荐每日摄入量以及根据能量摄入量调整的每日参考值进行比较。
患者的人口统计学特征如下:男性/女性为71/42;年龄(平均±标准差)为60±15岁;体重指数为28.6±6.0 kg/m²,血清肌酐为223.4±110.0 mmol/L。根据标准,80名患者(70.8%)低报了他们的能量摄入量。低报者更可能为女性且年龄较小,体重指数较高且血清肌酐升高。在所有患者中,每日能量摄入量(89.6±32.4 kJ/kg)低于推荐值(125 - 145 kJ/kg);然而,有效报告者并非如此(128.3±23.7 kJ/kg)。所有患者的蛋白质摄入量(0.9±0.3 g/kg)高于推荐值(0.75 g/kg),有效报告者甚至更高(1.2±0.3 g/kg)。所有患者的平均钙、锌和膳食纤维摄入量均低于推荐值,但这些差异在有效报告者中并不明显。
在不尝试排除低报者的情况下解读慢性肾病患者的自我报告饮食日记数据会导致错误结论,尤其是在能量、蛋白质、膳食纤维、钙和锌摄入量方面。